Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Piku/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 23 May 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of accolades received by Piku

[edit]

List of accolades received by Piku (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Ssven2 and Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Piku is one of the best Bollywood films of last year, and one of the most awarded ones. This listing of the notable awards and nominations it received is well-sourced and I believe it meets the FL criteria. I have another open FLC at the moment, but that has received 3 supports and has no outstanding comments. Krimuk|90 (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Yashthepunisher. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 05:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ssven2, the BH source doesn't say much about the plot. You can add a review instead. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Yashthepunisher: Added HT review.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 06:00, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:59, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
;Comments from Pavanjandhyala
  • Please provide a better alt text for the images, if possible.
Added.
  • Please avoid close repetition of "The film".
Changed.
  • It is better to call Piku a frustrated or short tempered architect rather than headstrong. Not trying to judge or support anyone, this was what i felt after watching the film.
I don't think that's a decent description of her character. She's headstrong, but not mean-spirited.
Guess i am weak at judging films. :) It's okay.
  • Please mention the characters' names in the plot summary if possible.
Too much details in an awards list, don't you think so? Will be better in the main article.
It's okay. That was optional. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Wikilink hypochondraic, New Delhi and Kolkata.
Done.
  • Uneven spacing in the list. Though not a problem, it is best to maintain homogeneity.
I'm not sure where you mean, sorry.
Kindly check the source code (i don't know what you guys call it, it is the editing space) once. You will find that there is no uniformity in the style of spacing for nom, win, sort for a few awards. I ask you to fix it. As i said earlier, it is not a big problem, but is just an effort to ensure no excessive nitpicking. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:56, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, I got it. Fixed. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Pavanjandhyala (talk) 02:27, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for commenting, Pavan. Krimuk|90 (talk) 03:03, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Piku is one of my favourite films. Thought i could partly contribute constructively to this list by reviewing this nomination. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Well, of course. Your comments are always appreciated. :) All seems to be done now. Krimuk|90 (talk) 05:02, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (talk) 06:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Vensatry
  • "Moushumi Chatterjee and Jisshu Sengupta portray supporting roles" - I'm a little skeptical on the usage of the word 'portray' in the given context. Unless you're more specific about the roles, it's safe to say 'play'.
Changed.
  • "Piku tells the story of a headstrong Bengali architect, who along with her hypochondriac father and a helpful businessman embark on a road trip from New Delhi to Kolkata." - 'headstrong' and 'hypochondriac father' are not covered by the source. Perhaps, substitute the former by 'arrogant'.
It's not possible to directly cite a film's plot from a source, as that would constitute a copy-vio. The film's plot is mostly verified via the film itself, which in this case it is. Also, I really think "arrogant" is not an apt description of Piku's character. She's strong, headstrong and is generally a positive personality, and not someone who is arrogant or mean-spirited.
I'm a long way from an expert in this area, but I think only the actual plot section (in the films's article) is an exception. I've not seen the film, but the source uses the word 'arrogant' three times while describing her character. —Vensatry (talk) 15:29, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See the film's description here. It uses the two words: hypochondriac and headstrong. Krimuk|90 (talk) 15:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, I've added another review that does a better job at describing her character. --Krimuk|90 (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • You need to correct the budget and gross figures; seems like they are inflated in the article.
Tweaked to mention that they are approximates. BOI figures are the most reliable though.
  • "As of March 2016, the film has won 32 awards." We're in May 2016. Given this is an Indian film, I suggest you to be less specific about the award count. Something like 'a minimum of 32 awards' would work.
Yep, changed.
  • Since 'Best Original Screenplay' and 'Best Dialogues' are grouped under the same page, pipe both links under the same name ([[Best Original Screenplay and Best Dialogues]]) to avoid overlinking.
Done.
  • 2016 Screen Awards ceremony - Why not mention the actual name of the ceremony (as in 63rd NFA, 61st FA)?
Done.
  • Is 'Jagran Film Festival' a notable ceremony? Ditto with 'Mirchi Music Awards' and 'Times of India Film Awards'.
I've only included those ceremonies which are covered by reliable sources, so I believe these ceremonies meet the notability criteria.
Thanks for the comments, Vensatry. I look forward to the source review! Krimuk|90 (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Krimuk90 and Vensatry: Thank you for your comments, Vensatry. Thanks for fixing them, Krimuk. I've removed Jagran but Mirchi and TOI awards seem to be notable have their own articles and are conducted by Radio Mirchi and The Times of India respectively.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 11:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ssven2, since the Jagram festival is covered by notable newspapers such as The Indian Express, Daily News and Analysis and Mid Day, as well as websites such as NDTV and Rediff, the ceremony meets the notability criteria as well. Krimuk|90 (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Isn't TOI a poll? —Vensatry (talk) 06:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The popular choice categories are, much like the People's Choice Awards The technical categories are awarded by jury members. Krimuk|90 (talk) 06:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source review (random spotchecks included)

@Vensatry: Is this one from Merinews ok?  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 10:00, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think the Sulekha one is better than Merinews. Krimuk|90 (talk) 15:50, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
How about this source? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 16:01, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Many thanks Pavan!! :) Vensatry, all your comments have been addressed now. :) Krimuk|90 (talk) 16:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the thorough review, Vensatry. :) Krimuk|90 (talk) 07:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Vensatry: Thank you, Vensatry. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated.  — Ssven2 Speak 2 me 07:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_accolades_received_by_Piku/archive1&oldid=1138485470"