Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by My Name Is Khan/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 5 March 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by My Name Is Khan[edit]
List of accolades received by My Name Is Khan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This article provides a listing of the notable awards and nominations received by the 2010 Indian Hindi drama film, My Name Is Khan starring Shah Rukh Khan and Kajol. This film is notable for garnering its cast and crew members several awards and nominations. It is my thirteenth attempt at an accolades FLC, and my second for a Bollywood awards list. Any constructive comments to improve this list are most welcome. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by ChrisTheDude[edit]
- Comment - "Rizwan Khan (Khan), a NRI suffering from Asperger syndrome who is married to a single mother, Mandira" - if she's married, then by definition she isn't single............ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:43, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If so, ChrisTheDude, then how do I rephrase the sentence? How do I say that he has married a woman who has a son from her previous marriage/relationship? — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I would pretty much just say what you have put above: "Rizwan Khan (Khan), a NRI suffering from Asperger syndrome whose wife, Mandira, has a child from a previous relationship"...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. As suggested, ChrisTheDude. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I would pretty much just say what you have put above: "Rizwan Khan (Khan), a NRI suffering from Asperger syndrome whose wife, Mandira, has a child from a previous relationship"...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If so, ChrisTheDude, then how do I rephrase the sentence? How do I say that he has married a woman who has a son from her previous marriage/relationship? — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:11, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Kailash[edit]
- Sameer dies as a result of a racist attack by school bullies - It happens in the US, right? Perhaps you may want to link to Racism in the United States.
- Rizwan takes her literally - Not like she was saying an idiom, was she? Or maybe an adynaton? Either way, you may want to replace "literally" with "seriously".
Just these two. I hope there is someone who has enough time to conduct a source review. --Kailash29792 (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Kailash29792, I have resolved the first but I believe "literally" would be more appropriate as she does tell him to tell the president that his name is Rizwan Khan and he's not a terrorist and questions him if he can do it. Although she said that out of grief for her son's death, Rizwan takes her words literally as it is and tries to implement it by meeting the president. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:27, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Not on the basis of COI, but because I find this good enough for FL. ----Kailash29792 (talk) 04:58, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, Kailash29792. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 09:04, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Vedant[edit]
I'll take a look later today. VedantTalk 04:53, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "a NRI suffering" - maybe you could spell out non-resident Indian as it'll be self-explanatory and the reader would not have to go to a separate page.
- The latter half of the first paragraph is a little monotonous with the overuse of was/were sentences. Maybe you could mix it up.
- Shouldn't the article use INRConvert?
- "went on to win for including" - four?
- "with Johar alone winning for Best Director (Bachchan)." - the "alone" isn't required.
The rest looks good. VedantTalk 16:55, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Numerounovedant, I have hopefully resolved all your comments. Do let me know if there's anything pending. Thanks. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 08:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case, I can support this for promotion. Fine work Ssven2. VedantTalk 15:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, Numerounovedant. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 15:58, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support from BeatlesLedTV[edit]
- Support – Looks good to me. Most things I can think of are covered above. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 01:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, BeatlesLedTV. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 02:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from Jim[edit]
I read and re-read the lead a couple of times before I worked out that this is probably set in the US, not India. If that's correct, it would help to make it explicit Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:28, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. As suggested, Jimfbleak. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:32, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't see anything else, changed to support above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, Jimfbleak. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 11:56, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't see anything else, changed to support above Jimfbleak - talk to me? 15:08, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from The Rambling Man[edit]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Otherwise all good. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support this one is good go, nice work. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:50, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you very much, The Rambling Man. Your thoughts and comments are greatly appreciated. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 12:17, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 20:37, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.