Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Blue Is the Warmest Colour/archive1
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 18:12, 17 November 2015 [1].
List of accolades received by Blue Is the Warmest Colour[edit]
List of accolades received by Blue Is the Warmest Colour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Blue Is the Warmest Colour is a 2013 French romantic coming-of-age drama directed by Abdellatif Kechiche. It stars Adèle Exarchopoulos, and Léa Seydoux. This is a hopefully comprehensive run down of its accolades. As usual look forward to all the helpful comments on how to improve it. Cowlibob (talk) 10:03, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from GagaNutellatalk 19:20, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments by GagaNutella
|
- @GagaNutella: Thanks for the review. Have added see also, removed redlinks, changed to accolades. In regard to the other comments, the first comment is not grammatically correct. The sentence is about who she plays in the film, which is a teenager who falls in love with an older woman. The dates are day/month/year as this is a French not an American film so doesn't follow American convention of month/day/year in its dates. Having more information about references which include who publishes the work is encouraged on Wikipedia, having just the work or publisher is acceptable but not the only way that references should be. Cowlibob (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I understood the date format, I just said that because this is an English Wikipedia, but you are right. About the references, even I'm supporting your FLC, I think you should give a chance and use only one of them (work or publisher). Anyway, this list looks amazing. Great job!!! GagaNutellatalk 15:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @GagaNutella: Thanks. I have made the format uniform for all refs. It is the English Wikipedia but not the American English Wikipedia so date formats can vary per WP:ENGVAR.Cowlibob (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for being so understanding and honest. That's amazing! GagaNutellatalk 00:55, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @GagaNutella: Thanks. I have made the format uniform for all refs. It is the English Wikipedia but not the American English Wikipedia so date formats can vary per WP:ENGVAR.Cowlibob (talk) 20:39, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I understood the date format, I just said that because this is an English Wikipedia, but you are right. About the references, even I'm supporting your FLC, I think you should give a chance and use only one of them (work or publisher). Anyway, this list looks amazing. Great job!!! GagaNutellatalk 15:53, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @GagaNutella: Thanks for the review. Have added see also, removed redlinks, changed to accolades. In regard to the other comments, the first comment is not grammatically correct. The sentence is about who she plays in the film, which is a teenager who falls in love with an older woman. The dates are day/month/year as this is a French not an American film so doesn't follow American convention of month/day/year in its dates. Having more information about references which include who publishes the work is encouraged on Wikipedia, having just the work or publisher is acceptable but not the only way that references should be. Cowlibob (talk) 13:43, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Birdienest81 (talk) 23:26, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Quick Comment
|
- Support: Nice list. When you have the time, could you kindly proofread 60th Academy Awards for my latest FLC, please?
- Comments by Maile
-
- Image - Freely licensed on Commons and has an OTRS tag. Its use in the list is captioned and has W:ALT alternative text.
- Sourcing - Those listed appear to be credible sources. Earwig's tool shows no issues of concern on copyvio or close paraphrasing.
- List format - WP:DTT Table is well formatted with scope=row and scope=column, references centered within the column.
- Support - — Maile (talk) 15:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments by Vivvt
Resolved comments from - Vivvt (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments by Vivvt
|
- Support All of my comments have been resolved. - Vivvt (Talk) 16:44, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.