Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Poland/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 4 January 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of World Heritage Sites in Poland (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Tone 19:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Poland has 16 sites on the main list and 6 more on the tentative list. The style is standard as per several earlier FLCs. This article is on the longer side and I had to rewrite most of the descriptions since they were either copied directly from the UNESCO pages or included data that were not related to the actual WHS. In any case, I think it is ready now. The map is a bit crowded but I think the size is fine nevertheless. Lots of churches from different sites that I solved with color-coding. Tone 19:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
|
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 14:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from TRM
That's it for a quick pass. The Rambling Man (Hands! Face! Space!!!!) 21:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
|
Source review - Pass
[edit]- Formatting is consistent
- Not convinced touropia.com is a reliable source, I would recommend switching it out
- Reliabillity is good otherwise Aza24 (talk) 09:20, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aza24: I removed the reference, it was not in the UNESCO source anyway. --Tone 16:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Great, pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 16:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aza24: I removed the reference, it was not in the UNESCO source anyway. --Tone 16:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Alexandra
- I have added alt text to the map, which like the other current world heritage site FLC had a bizarre "List of WHSs in X is located in X" style alt text - feel free to tweak wording. May also be good if you go over your previous / future FLCs and make sure the alt texts for maps are okay in those, and manually add alt texts like this one if they're not.
the Wooden Tserkvas of Carpathian Region in Poland and Ukraine with Ukraine
- can we shorten it in the lead to "Wooden Tserkvas of Carpathian Region", or otherwise rephrase the sentence, to avoid saying that the site is partially in Ukraine twice in immediate succession?- Looks good otherwise. Please ping me when you have addressed the above, and I will be with you asap.--AlexandraIDV 06:51, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Alexandra IDV: Fixed, makes perfect sense. --Tone 08:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent, I have confirmed the change.--AlexandraIDV 08:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Alexandra IDV: Fixed, makes perfect sense. --Tone 08:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support--AlexandraIDV 08:27, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Great job improving the article with everyone's suggestions above. I didn't find any issues so I support this nomination. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:15, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:09, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.