Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Wisden Trophy records
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 16 days, 2 support, 1 oppose. Lack of active discussion. Fail. Scorpion0422 02:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Is a self-nomination. The list is cricket-related and I believe is well sourced. Think it meets FA criteria but am relatively new at this. Monsta666 22:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - The lead is written a bit informally, and could do with a bit more referencing too. I'll try to reword a bit, but help me out :) Also, I see you've added a source (cricinfo) at the bottom of some of the tables - it would be better if you placed this inline (using cite.php) at the top of one of the columns. Otherwise it's good - fix up a few things, and I'll support. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 05:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Response - Put refs in lead (is that enough or are more needed?) and placed inline cites on tables Monsta666 10:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Excellent work. Support. Good luck :) Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 03:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong oppose
- Severely abusive use of flags.
- That can easily be removed - DIY, perhaps? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This can be removed but there should be a way of telling whether a is record held by the Englishman or West Indian. I felt the use of flags was the easiest way of doing this. Any ideas how I can do this without the use of flags? Added Later - Unnecessary flags have been removed but kept flags for players. Monsta666 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How' but, y'know, just using the name of the "country"? I'm pretty most read can see that "England" and "West Indies" are different things. Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- In the players stats, flags should go for a "team" column. Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- How' but, y'know, just using the name of the "country"? I'm pretty most read can see that "England" and "West Indies" are different things. Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- This can be removed but there should be a way of telling whether a is record held by the Englishman or West Indian. I felt the use of flags was the easiest way of doing this. Any ideas how I can do this without the use of flags? Added Later - Unnecessary flags have been removed but kept flags for players. Monsta666 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- That can easily be removed - DIY, perhaps? Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Poor formatting of tables making the sorting impossible (Main stats) or useless (records).
- Erm, where is this sorting you speak of? None of the tables I see are sortable. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sort of my point, actually. There's no good reason they could not be made sortable (the only one is that their improper formatting prevents it.) Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand what you are trying to get at. What does sortable tables mean? Monsta666 15:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad, I sometimes forget not everyone is acquainted with that possibility. You'll want to look at Help:Sorting (though it's more technical than really needed for our purpose). A good way to make table more sortable is to use table captions instead of table-wide header cells at the top of tables. Circeus 05:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed some of it myself. Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My bad, I sometimes forget not everyone is acquainted with that possibility. You'll want to look at Help:Sorting (though it's more technical than really needed for our purpose). A good way to make table more sortable is to use table captions instead of table-wide header cells at the top of tables. Circeus 05:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't understand what you are trying to get at. What does sortable tables mean? Monsta666 15:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sort of my point, actually. There's no good reason they could not be made sortable (the only one is that their improper formatting prevents it.) Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Erm, where is this sorting you speak of? None of the tables I see are sortable. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Combination of various tables that shouldn't (every double from "List of captains" onward).
- Are you proposing that these tables be removed? I feel the records section is relevant but that is just my opinion.Monsta666 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I say there should 2 table, not one. The combination into one is a nonsensical space-saving device that is entirely inappropriate. Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done the tables are now split. Monsta666 15:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Captains table should also be separated and sortable (although you could keep a simplified table to show only the series and captains). Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done the tables are now split. Monsta666 15:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I say there should 2 table, not one. The combination into one is a nonsensical space-saving device that is entirely inappropriate. Circeus 14:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you proposing that these tables be removed? I feel the records section is relevant but that is just my opinion.Monsta666 12:49, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Despite what is said in the article, there is no "Notes" section.- Fixed. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed the table myself to avoid thetwo notes overtaken by the references. Circeus 23:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. Dihydrogen Monoxide (H2O) 08:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See also not properly formatted.
- Severely abusive use of flags.
- Circeus 03:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]