Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Turner Prize winners and nominees/archive2
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 04:57, 8 July 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): The Rambling Man (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Featured list candidates/List of Turner Prize winners and nominees/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Turner Prize winners and nominees/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
Renominating. Despite having considerable support last time round, User:Tyrenius raised a number of concerns which caused me to withdraw the nomination and work the list up a bit. Hopefully I've addressed most, if not all of his concerns, and in doing so have created an even better list than the one I first nominated. Comments, concerns, questions will, as ever, be handled as quickly as possible. Thanks in advance for your time. The Rambling Man (talk) 06:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I made a few changes rather than quibble about minor things here; feel free to revert if I've accidentally reintroduced misphrasings that were picked up last time round. Looks good to me, so unless someone comes up with something I've not spotted, I'll support. BencherliteTalk 19:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. As far as I can tell, you've done nothing more than polish the existing markup (and inevitably claim that dark blue is the colour...) As ever, charmed, enchanted and grateful. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:24, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - looks good —Chris! ct 23:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I made a couple minor tweaks [2], and the bulk of my concerns were addressed last time around. Nice job. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSupport -- Looks good, I did a few minor tweaks but other than that the list meets WP:WIAFL.However, one thing: in this sentence 'Winners' reactions to the award range from Hirst's "A media circus to raise money for the Tate and Channel 4" to Deller's "It blew me away, people's hunger to see what I'd done".' -- It could use a link and full spelling of these winners.--Truco 503 00:40, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]- All "first time links" are linked, including Tate Britain which wasn't linked anywhere in the prose (I think....!) The Rambling Man (talk) 18:16, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as I did before...Modernist (talk) 01:15, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.