Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya episodes/archive2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 8 support, 0 oppose. Promote. --MarcK 11:39, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
After the removal of the images last month, and some addition of some references (along with the newly formatted table), I believe this list is up to FL standards.--十八 02:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nom. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 05:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Maybe my opinion is a little biased, but I believe that if it's only reason for failure last time was the images, and the images are gone, it's good. Sbloemeke 12:27, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, looks alright. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 15:25, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, the sortability is a killer app for a MoHS episode list and it's pretty much the best it can be otherwise as well. Only two minor niggles (not deal breakers): Maybe the matter of the "standard" DVD release should be explained a bit (as far as I know, the special edition of the DVD has a second set of disks in air order?), and maybe it should be explained that said "DVD order" is the same for the Japanese and English DVDs (which I believe it is) -- grm_wnr Esc 22:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've changed the wording of the sentence to mention both the English and Japanese versions (it's supported by the reference). As for the first concern, I think that unless the statement states, otherwise, there's only a chronological order on the disc. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:12, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per Sephiroth and Phoenix. Cliff smith 17:27, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, looks like an FL-quality list. Sure I'd like an image, but that's not going to happen. Doesn't really need one, the article's good as it is.--Wizardman 01:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: looks good. -- Underneath-it-All 00:32, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]