Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Texas Tech Red Raiders in the NFL Draft/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 02:18, 11 July 2010 [1].
List of Texas Tech Red Raiders in the NFL Draft (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): NThomas (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I based this NFL Draft list off of the FLs List of Oklahoma Sooners in the NFL Draft and List of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft. I feel it meets all of the FLC. NThomas (talk) 01:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment was Crabtree picked ninth (caption) or tenth (table)? Mm40 (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Corrected. The table was right; caption was wrong. NThomas (talk) 04:46, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
"This includes 6 players taken in the first round and one overall number one pick". Comparitive elements like this should consistently be numerals or words, not both. I suggest switching the first one to a word.
- Changed 6 to six. NThomas (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Link Pro Bowl in the first use.
- Linked.
One of the general references is a little larger than the others for some reason. Is it something with the formatting?Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:13, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed it. There was a duplicate tag before the last reference NThomas (talk) 08:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 02:11, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Wizardman Operation Big Bear 02:43, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comment:
Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:48, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 18:10, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
- Support Looks great to me and has the feel and the content of a FL article.BLUEDOGTN 16:58, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support A wonderful list. WereWolf (talk) 01:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.