Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ROH World Champions/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:46, 25 April 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): --WillC 09:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured list because... I'm working my way through all the main promotion championship history articles that have yet to be expanded to FL. I am also going to expand each championship article to GA or higher. Currently I've gotten List of TNA X Division Champions to FL, and it looks like it at the moment that List of TNA World Tag Team Champions will pass its FLC. I'm working on the TNA X Division Championship in a subpage at the moment, so I am true to my word. Seeing as the ROH World Championship history is long enough for FLC, I added it to my list of projects along with ROH's World Tag Team Championship. Any comments will be addressed as quick as possible. This article does not look like it is sourced greatly but the three general refs really source everything in the article by themselves. Number of defenses, champions, results, etc. Yes the ROH Championship's first name was ROH Title, it was not referred to as ROH Championship to my knowledge. It is sourced by ROH's official site where they have the history cut among names. It begins with ROH Title and after Joe's reign it begins as ROH World Championship. None of the live events were pay-per-views besides just one and it is linked with-in the article.WillC 09:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, because it has been bugging me, for the ones wondering why I haven't reviewed another FLC and I keep nominating lists for FLC, it is because I am unsure of myself at this time. I want to make sure I know what a FL is and get enough knowledge before I review. After this list I will probably start reviewing if this passes.--WillC 09:31, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved to meet WP:WIAFL, and I'm sure any further issues will be resolved ;)--Truco 23:47, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the comments and the support.--WillC 23:53, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments -
"The title was called the ROH Championship up until the title...". Change second "the title" to "it" to avoid redundant wording."after then-champion Samoa Joe, defeated ROH Pure Champion Nigel McGuinness in Liverpool, England." Remove comma after Samoa Joe.In footnote D, change the comma to a semi-colon.Giants2008 (17-14) 15:14, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]- All are finished.--WillC 17:03, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Footnote D could use a period, but otherwise this looks ready to be featured. Giants2008 (17-14) 15:07, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What makes http://entertainment.howstuffworks.com/pro-wrestling.htm reliable?- Likewise http://solie.org/titlehistories/htroh.html? It says that it was compiled by a specific person, so what makes that person reliable? Dabomb87 (talk) 22:34, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- For the first one, it was found reliable at the Over the Edge (1999) (FAC), because its from Discovery. The second one: when I use this source its for titles from the past which the info is published in a book. If ROH publishes a list for the reigns, this is unnecessary.--Truco 22:54, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any mention of the first source at the linked FAC... Dabomb87 (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. I could of sworn, someone mentioned it there. Either way, its used in that FAC and Ealdgyth didn't say anything about it (considering it was one of the first refs). In addition, the site is run by Discovery, and their information is published the same way that Discovery does for all their other sites.--Truco 23:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ed Grabianowski is the writer. So, what makes him a reputable author in this area? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- His biography by Discovery. He also write for various other publications.--Truco 01:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The first link does nothing to convince me. The second is better, but it doesn't demonstrate how he is an expert in wrestling. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:05, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How about I remove the link? I've had List of TNA X Division Champions and List of TNA World Tag Team Champions pass their FLCs without the need for a link to explain pro wrestling, I don't think it will cause a problem.--WillC 01:12, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't object to that. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, removed.--WillC 01:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It shouldn't be removed because its OR if you don't source it. In addition, these sources could probably cover how he wrote the article. This could easily be replaced if it were a WWE article since they tend to be honest about it on their site, but I don't know how TNA works.--Truco 01:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, removed.--WillC 01:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't believe it is OR. Most understand the titles aren't won legit. As for the WWE and TNA thing, hahaha. WWE being honest, I needed that. Hey, have you heard of a guy named Chris Benoit, I've never heard of him.--WillC 01:44, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not funny, its very disrespectful [stay on task]. I meant honest about how pro wrestling works in their company.--Truco 02:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Disrespectful to the WWE yes. I miss Benoit and WWE should have never tried to bury his legacy. Yeah with the corporate site, they must or they'll have a lawsuit on their hands for false advertisement.--WillC 02:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's not funny, its very disrespectful [stay on task]. I meant honest about how pro wrestling works in their company.--Truco 02:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I wouldn't object to that. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:19, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- His biography by Discovery. He also write for various other publications.--Truco 01:03, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ed Grabianowski is the writer. So, what makes him a reputable author in this area? Dabomb87 (talk) 23:29, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmm. I could of sworn, someone mentioned it there. Either way, its used in that FAC and Ealdgyth didn't say anything about it (considering it was one of the first refs). In addition, the site is run by Discovery, and their information is published the same way that Discovery does for all their other sites.--Truco 23:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see any mention of the first source at the linked FAC... Dabomb87 (talk) 23:02, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever, I'm done.--Truco 02:32, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay.--WillC 02:45, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Just for you to know, the reason I'm not talking about the sources is I don't know. I just use sources I see used it other FLs, FAs, or GAs. I figure if they are good enough there, then they are good enough to use in this. That is why I asked Truco to take care of these problems, I use most of the sources he uses in other lists. He knows more about reliablity of sources than me.--WillC 00:08, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.