Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Naruto chapters (Part II)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 15:07, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a list of chapters of the Naruto manga. This article was split off from List of Naruto chapters due to size and readability concerns, with the other list being List of Naruto chapters (Part I). I believe it qualifies under the featured list criteria. The summaries used to provide context for each volume are not excessive in size, and all other relevant information is covered. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 06:04, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: Well written and cited. -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 16:20, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I really can't fault it with anything. I presume the lateness of the ISBN-13 showing up is because they didn't use them before that volume? Circeus 04:46, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- More or less. I can't find any special circumstances surrounding it. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 04:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't worry. Although most printed ISBNs were supposed to switch to 13 digits on January 1, 2007, in practice they didn't until at least a few months in most editors' case. Circeus 05:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I see. Fair enough. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 05:37, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't worry. Although most printed ISBNs were supposed to switch to 13 digits on January 1, 2007, in practice they didn't until at least a few months in most editors' case. Circeus 05:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- More or less. I can't find any special circumstances surrounding it. Sephiroth BCR (Converse) 04:58, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per first two. Like the first one, it has the necessary aspects of a well-done list, being only marginally different in that it is updated somewhat more frequently. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 08:44, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]