Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of NFL champions/archive1

List of NFL champions

It seems like it fits the criteria to me. Its been on peer review here for close to a week, and only two comments have been posted. One said it looked good to be nominated, and the other said to maybe cut down on the images. Personally, I like the images as they are, so I haven't changed them at all, but if a consensus says to change them it's obviously an easy fix. In any case, I think it meets the criteria and should be nominated.jfg284 14:50, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: usually the peer review of an article runs for a month before it is delisted. As I understand it this guideline is not written in stone, but just over a week is not enough time to give the article sufficient exposure. So maybe you should have been a little more patient before nominating.

That said, I have to agree with the comment in PR about the images in that they tend to clutter the page a bit. Also, you have not addressed the suppossed bias of the pictures by either removing them or explaining in a convincing way why they should remain in the article ("I like them" is not convincing). Finally, it would be nice if all the tables in the "NFL championships" section were of the same width. Hope this helps. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 15:06, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

~~Object~~
1. ~~The images Image:George Halas Photo.jpg, Image:Ice Bowl Photo.jpg have no fair-use rationale.~~
2. ~~The image Image:Curly lambeau.jpg has no source information. It's not possible to claim fair use without knowing the source.~~
3. ~~Overall, the images clutter the list rather than adding to it. I'd recommend getting rid of everything except the NFL logo.~~
--Carnildo 04:29, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the offending images. And all the other ones except the NFL logo.jfg284 12:34, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support now. I'd still like to see those tables at the same width though. -- Rune Welsh | ταλκ | Esperanza 17:09, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Which is now done, thanks to Demcdevit.

Support, not only because I created the list on which this one is based, but all issues above have been addressed. Phoenix2 22:46, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment from peer review: An excellent page. I would separate out the last four championships and indicate that the winners played in the Super Bowl. Also, since the 1939 game was not played in Green Bay, I'd put the city in parentheses after the name of the stadium. Finally, some of the games have articles on them, so there should be links to them. -- Mwalcoff 05:02, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

The 1939 game was fixed on 6 November, and there has been a note about the last four games since then as well. However, I have just seperated the last four games into their own table and am beginning the process of adding game wikilinks.jfg284

Edits performed as requested.jfg284 15:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Great. Support. -- Mwalcoff 01:21, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Query whether the bullet points between the tables should be turned into text with sub-section headings. e.g. "===Eastern and Western Divisions==="; "===American and National Conferences==="; "===Eastern and Western Conferences===". -- ALoan (Talk) 10:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]