Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Muni Metro stations
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:58, 3 February 2009 [1].
My first FL nomination or maybe in a featured process of any sort. This is a continuation of the trend of bringing San Francisco Bay Area rail station lists here for FL consideration. —kurykh 08:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support —Chris! ct 19:53, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Chrishomingtang
|
---|
I helped write this list and am satisfy with it, but I still have some comments.
|
- Comments - boy oh boy I love metro stuff. So, some comments, from overcast Cusco...
- Any reason that the Castro line is excluded from the map?
- The official Muni Metro map that the list's map is based off of does not have the S Castro Shuttle line on it. —kurykh 06:51, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ¨...stops that consist from a traffic island or a sign painted on a telephone pole..." doesn´t read well to me..
- Done. —kurykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- BART should be explained before being used as an acronym.
- Done. —kurykh 06:27, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is Castro stuff in italics?
- Because the Castro line is a line with limited service.—Chris! ct 21:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fine, but forgive my ignorance, where is that stated in the key or in the text? The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Because the Castro line is a line with limited service.—Chris! ct 21:14, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No need to superinflate the image sizes of the stations - i think you´re forcing the image sizes to 270px, no need.
- Fixed by Chrishomingtang. —kurykh 06:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Surface stations Platform col does not sort correctly.
- Fixed by Chrishomingtang. —kurykh 06:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Any reason that the Castro line is excluded from the map?
- Good work, not too far off I reckon. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 20:44, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support my concerns addressed, good work. The Rambling Man on tour (talk) 16:45, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, Rambling man basically read the review in my mind :P. I have the same concerns raised by TRM, I can support once those are done because this is excellent, but those few problems.--TRUCO 22:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - meets WP:WIAFL.--TRUCO 22:09, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Wow, Rambling man basically read the review in my mind :P. I have the same concerns raised by TRM, I can support once those are done because this is excellent, but those few problems.--TRUCO 22:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- "Muni Metro is a light rail system serving San Francisco, California"-->Muni Metro is a light rail system that serves San Francisco, California.
- Done. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Muni Metro serves 173,000 passengers a day, making it the second busiest in the United States" Secpnd-busiest what?
- Done. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "The system consists of nine subway stations, 24 surface stations" Comparable quantities should be written the same way. Either make them both numerals or both written out.
- Done. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- "Four
of thestations"- Done. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The backgrounds should not cover the whole row, only the "Station" column. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, other similar FLs have backgrounds covering the entire row. Leaving this the exception would be strange. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So then, we change the others. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. —kurykh 19:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So then, we change the others. Dabomb87 (talk) 19:41, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, other similar FLs have backgrounds covering the entire row. Leaving this the exception would be strange. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:33, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
On several refs, you spell out abbreviations, which is good, but you never actually use the abbreviations by themselves. I think that those parenthetical abbrevations should be removed.- Done. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Refs 1, 8 and 15 needformat=PDF
added to them.- Done. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What makes http://world.nycsubway.org/us/sf/muni-streetcar.html a reliable source?- Removed; other sources suffice. —kurykh 19:40, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dabomb87 (talk) 17:08, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.