Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Los Angeles Kings head coaches

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 06:56, 3 March 2009 [1].

List of Los Angeles Kings head coaches

[edit]
Nominator(s): -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]]
Toolbox

-- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 03:19, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Truco

Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)

Lead
  • The franchise's first head coach was Red Kelly, who coached for two complete seasons. Andy Murray is the franchise's all-time leader for the most regular-season games coached (480), the most regular-season game wins (215), and the most regular-season points (519); Tom Webster is the franchise's all-time leader for the most playoff games coached (28); Barry Melrose is the franchise's all-time leader for the most playoff-game wins (13), and the highest playoff winning percentage (.542), which is the only one over .500. -- the only one over .500 in what? NHL history or the Kings' history?
  • Melrose is the only coach to have won a conference championship in the Kings, which was won in the 1993 Stanley Cup playoffs. -- Don't you mean "with the Kings" and not in the Kings?
References
  • For refs like number 4, wouldn't the publisher be NHL.com and the work would be from Lincoln Hockey and National Hockey League, like SLAM! Sports is the work of the publisher Canadian Online Explorer.
Do, it shouldn't, since Lincoln Hockey and National Hockey League are the publishers, and NHL.com is where the work came from. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 00:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Gotcha.--TRUCO 00:46, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--TRUCO 23:48, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
  • "who coached for two complete seasons. "
Some coaches coaches for two season, but may have been fired during the season. also, it's nothing wrong with putting "complete". -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 21:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"complete" is understood unless you specify otherwise. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I just said that some coaches don't complete their last season, or came in when the season started. Also, there's no clear reason why "complete" should be removed. What matters is that the grammar is all right, which it is. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 00:14, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
It is a unnecessary word. When readers see "coached for two seasons", they will assume "complete" unless otherwise told. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:24, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Done, but still believe removed it is not needed. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 03:19, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • "which was won "
Removed "which was won", since it'll sound awkward with the "won" when having "which was" removed. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 21:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Image caption: "coached the Kings for four complete seasons."
Above. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 21:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Above. Dabomb87 (talk) 00:08, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dabomb87 (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_Los_Angeles_Kings_head_coaches&oldid=1138482959"