Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves recipients (1943)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:00, 8 February 2011 [1].
List of Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves recipients (1943) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this as the third of five lists for featured list because I feel this list already meets the criteria. Due to the few number of recipients in the years 1940 and 1941 the two years had to be merged into one list. Once completed the five lists 1940–1941 (currently a featured list), 1942 (currently a featured list), 1943, 1944 and 1945 will comprise all of the generally accepted 882 recipients of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross with Oak Leaves. I welcome any constructive feedback. Thanks in advance. MisterBee1966 (talk) 08:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Quick comments –
Recipients of 1943: In the parenthetical Army, there's a bracket that shouldn't be there.If possible, make it so that note 15 doesn't have the contraction ("hadn't").Minor again, but reference 126 has a stray quotation mark.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 01:29, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
Comment:- in Note # 15: "Stadler himself claimed that Dietrich proposed him on 22 March 1945..." I don't believe that "proposed him" is grammatically correct. I'm not exactly sure what is meant by it, so I haven't tweaked it. Are you using it to say "presented the medal to him"? If so, I think it should be changed to that. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It better reads as "claimed that Dietrich had nominated him on 22 March 1945". Does this work? MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that works for me. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 20:10, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It better reads as "claimed that Dietrich had nominated him on 22 March 1945". Does this work? MisterBee1966 (talk) 17:12, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- in Note # 15: "Stadler himself claimed that Dietrich proposed him on 22 March 1945..." I don't believe that "proposed him" is grammatically correct. I'm not exactly sure what is meant by it, so I haven't tweaked it. Are you using it to say "presented the medal to him"? If so, I think it should be changed to that. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 00:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, a well-written list that I see no problems with. Only concern I may have is the number of redlinks, since I'm sure they could all be blue, but that's not an FLC issue. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 19:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support next up, 1944/45? Good, patient work. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:07, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Nice work!Intothatdarkness (talk) 18:26, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support As I would expect, you have this down by now. Courcelles 18:50, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.