Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Eastern Europe/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by NapHit 08:32, 25 December 2012 [1].
List of Intangible Cultural Heritage elements in Eastern Europe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): xanchester (t) 12:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for FL because I believe the list is detailed, comprehensive and meets the featured list criteria. xanchester (t) 12:44, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 05:20, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
TBrandley 14:56, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support TBrandley 22:40, 2 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 21:08, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Quick early comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
- Comment. Sorry to be so late with this, but I've just noticed that the table appears very odd because the description column is so narrow. On my set up, each row fills around half my (high-res) screen, with most of it blank, and the description strung out at one to four words per line. Can this be improved?
- Image placement at the top is very busy. Could the column of smaller images start lower down?
- I also have some issues with the lead. The 'elements' phrasing it uses is hard to understand. Does this originate in this list, or is it a technical term used in the treaty?
- In general I felt the lead seems very full of long boilerplate sentences and lacking much insight. Can you at least give more context on how the Eastern European items compare with other areas, at least in proportion of the total? I found myself going straight to the complete list for information. Also can you make generalisations about what kinds of things are listed for Eastern Europe? Does this differ from other areas?
- 'The "intangible cultural heritage" is defined by the Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage, drafted in 2003 and took effect in 2006.' seems to have grammatical problems.
- I'd suggest splitting the final sentence to make it clearer which countries lack these items. Espresso Addict (talk) 01:03, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.