Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.)/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 22:10, 14 March 2009 [1].
- Featured list candidates/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.)/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of Hot 100 number-one singles of 2005 (U.S.)/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because it was peer reviewed and I feel it meets the criteria. Regards, Efe (talk) 11:39, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues have been resolved to meet WP:WIAFL standards.--₮RUCӨ 21:35, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Commments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Is the page the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars? I notice it is semi-protected from editing. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 06:14, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There were some IPs who feel that the current formatting of the tables look awful. What they did was restore the list form and remove the lead. They were invited to discuss the matter, but they did not. They persisted so Eric protected them. --Efe (talk) 06:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, I had to revert another IP yesterday who was quietly tampering with the navbox at the bottom. Dabomb87 (talk) 12:50, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Hidden category: