Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Gold Glove Award winners at third base/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:39, 27 June 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I can. Just kidding. Of course I wouldn't bring anything here that I didn't think met the criteria, nor would I nominate it if I didn't intend to address the comments raised. Cheers. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:14, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just a couple comments though,
- The first reference isn't working. There are no Disambiguous links, the table formatting looks good, I checked it through AWB and there are no general fixes needed, all the references have good formatting and the lead seems like a good summery of the article. Not much on sports data but other than that it looks like a good list. --Kumioko (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The reference does work. If you checked it through the external link checker in the toolbox, it shows up blue because the SI archives block bots and scripts. If you click through directly from the article, you can see the reference. Can you clarify what you mean by "not much on sports data"? KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry I was referring to myself regarding the data in the table. I wouldn't know if its correct. Sorry I should have been more clear.--Kumioko (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, I understand. Thanks for your support! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:33, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry I was referring to myself regarding the data in the table. I wouldn't know if its correct. Sorry I should have been more clear.--Kumioko (talk) 13:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The reference does work. If you checked it through the external link checker in the toolbox, it shows up blue because the SI archives block bots and scripts. If you click through directly from the article, you can see the reference. Can you clarify what you mean by "not much on sports data"? KV5 (Talk • Phils) 11:29, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved/clarified; list now meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 20:08, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support main issues resolved. – (iMatthew • talk) at 14:37, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
"Hall of Famers to win a Gold Glove"-->Hall of Famers to have won a Gold Glove
- Changed to "who have won"; seemed a bit less awkward. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"The least errors committed in a winning season is five" A bit too ambiguous; make it more obvious that you are referring to third-base Gold Glove winners.
- Done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"only pair of brothers to win Gold Glove Awards"-->only pair of brothers to have Gold Glove AwardsDabomb87 (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I assume you meant "to have won"; done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 21:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I did, sorry for the error. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:34, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Very good, just as the others in the series are. Giants2008 (17-14) 21:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.