Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Gold Glove Award winners at first base/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 22:39, 27 June 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
It's the same as always, folks; review and enjoy! KV5 (Talk • Phils) 16:32, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments – Three Baseball-Reference links are showing up as dead. Giants2008 (17-14) 22:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Found a fourth, and fixed all. Done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 22:48, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Before finding the dead links, I was on the verge of giving a rare straight support. Great lists like this really make reviewing easy. Wish they could all be this simple for me. Giants2008 (17-14) 21:28, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
"Steve Garvey and Mark Grace have won four Gold Gloves at first base." You say they won four at first base. Does that mean they've won Gold Gloves at other positions too?
- No... I did explain below that Darin Erstad is the only one who has won at multiple positions. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Re-worded slightly to be clearer. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 14:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 23 – use "page" instead of "pages" in the cite template, since you're using only one page.Dabomb87 (talk) 13:30, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yup, got it. Done. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:04, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from SRE.K.A.L.24
|
---|
Comments from -- SRE.K.A.L.24[c]
-- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 22:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support I was going to come back to this nomination, but had plans this afternoon, which was why I couldn't reply back. Sorry for that. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 01:36, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – (iMatthew • talk) at 02:17, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Mild oppose
|
- Support nicely done. Great constructive responses and edits to my criticisms, well done. The Rambling Man (talk) 13:27, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.