Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Dexter episodes/archive4
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 01:50, 24 August 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
And another month of waiting for somebody still not bored with episode lists because the last FLCs were closed early. Nergaal (talk) 04:41, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No they weren't. Matthewedwards : Chat 18:02, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to agree with Matthewedwards here, though the second FLC was closed early because there wasn't enough time to fix a reviewer's comments. But does this really matter?--Music26/11 19:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- It doesn't. I was trying to make a point about the last FLC where for 10 days nothing happened, then at day 10 and 16 first detailed comments were made which were fixed quickly; and when another set of comments came at day 20 when I was traveling, the FLC was closed. I bet that nobody will make any significant comments until this gets listed at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/backlog/items. Nergaal (talk) 20:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I have to agree with Matthewedwards here, though the second FLC was closed early because there wasn't enough time to fix a reviewer's comments. But does this really matter?--Music26/11 19:57, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Diaa
|
---|
Comments--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 16:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support The list meets all Featured list criteria and all issues have been addressed as much as possible.--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 06:54, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, issues from previous FLCs have been resolved. I don't think that we need to go too in-depth on awards and reception, as that's what the main article is for. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thought, I think there should be a couple reviews for each season. Here are some for season three, it shouldn't be too hard to find them for the other seasons. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:41, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you be slightly more specific? You want a sentence in each section about the general view of the season? Nergaal (talk) 17:47, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- How are the additions I made? Nergaal (talk) 18:29, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabomb: is that support still striked? If yes, is there a particular reason for it? Nergaal (talk) 17:35, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What makes http://www.buddytv.com/articles/dexter/cbs-welcomes-dexter-tonight-16698.aspx?pollid=360&answer=1444#poll360 reliable?Dabomb87 (talk) 14:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- BuddyTV is considered reliable because it bases its articles on published articles and press releases (which it sometimes also links too). The source for a BuddyTV article is always below the author's name (in this case Showtime and TV Guide). In addition BuddyTV is used in various new FAs ("Through the Looking Glass", "Pilot", "Premiere", "The Beginning of the End") on Wikipedia.--Music26/11 16:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm on the fence about it. Here's an LA Times article that can replace the air date source. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:09, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I've switched with the LATimes reference. thanks, Nergaal (talk) 15:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OK. The other use of buddytv is uncontroversial so I'll let it be. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:39, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note FLC is currently short of reviewers; please consider reviewing one or more on the nomination list if you have not already (this message is being posted to all running FLCs). Dabomb87 (talk) 23:21, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Question for reviewers is this notable for mentioning in the 4th season? Normally would be in the production section of a separate article on the season, but I don't know if it should be in this broader article. Nergaal (talk) 16:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless the event affected the episodes themselves, or the production, in a significant way, I don't think it's worth mentioning here. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- Previous issues from past 2 FLC's have been resolved from me to meet WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 22:14, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.