Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Cleveland Browns head coaches
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 23:48, 20 December 2008 [1].
Nom by SRE.K.A.L.24 and myself Gary King (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
- Support - Excellent list, no prose nor table problems. Complies with WP:WIAFL.--SRX 22:13, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment from Killervogel5
- Looks great, except... Miami Gardens, Florida!? That can't be right. KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 23:45, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh damn, thanks for catching that. Fixed! Gary King (talk) 23:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support from KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 23:59, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh damn, thanks for catching that. Fixed! Gary King (talk) 23:50, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Sources looks good, checked with the Checklinks tool.
Cannibaloki 21:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, good job. Jaespinoza (talk) 18:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- Needs playoff win% added to the columns.
- May you tell me why is that? -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 03:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Because it is in the same source as the other info. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm going to let Gary King decide on this decision, because if we add this column on, we will not be consistent with mos tof the other NFL head coaches lists. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 03:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]- As I have already told SRX on the New Orleans list, this is not about consistency; comprehensiveness is more important. If you are so concerned about consistency, rest assure that I will put this info in the other lists soon (probably this weekend). Notice that
all thebasketball head coach FLs do this also. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:03, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]- False statement about, "Notice that all the basketball head coach FLs do this also." It isn't on some of them. Also, I do agree with you about the comprehensiveness before consistency. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 08:15, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply] - True, and notice that most of the basketball head coach FLs without the column were promoted earlier. Anyway, I will put them in also this weekend. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- False statement about, "Notice that all the basketball head coach FLs do this also." It isn't on some of them. Also, I do agree with you about the comprehensiveness before consistency. -- SRE.K.A
- I am already going through the NFL head coach FLs that were promoted earlier and bringing them up to the current standards; adding the playoff win% column may be a bit tedious but easy to do. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As I have already told SRX on the New Orleans list, this is not about consistency; comprehensiveness is more important. If you are so concerned about consistency, rest assure that I will put this info in the other lists soon (probably this weekend). Notice that
- I'm going to let Gary King decide on this decision, because if we add this column on, we will not be consistent with mos tof the other NFL head coaches lists. -- SRE.K.A
- Because it is in the same source as the other info. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:39, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Make the linking of publishers consistent; some are linked every time and others are linked on the first appearance.
- In the second paragraph, four consecutive sentences start with "Brown". Can we diversify a bit?
- Done, but check to make sure about the grammar. -- SRE.K.A
nnoyomous.L.24[c] 03:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:46, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support/Comment It'd probably look better to center the figures in the table. Other than that everything looks good. §hep • ¡Talk to me! 11:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.