Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Calgary Flames players
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 11 days, 5 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 14:06, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Self-nom. Based on List of Colorado Avalanche players and List of New Jersey Devils players, both of which are FLs. It is factually accurate, uncontroversial, useful, stable, comprehensive, well-constructed and has numerous images. Resolute 22:10, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I like it and I do not have any objections but I want to point out that the image of Kiprusoff overlaps the table at 1024x768 resolution. --Krm500 22:36, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I shrunk the image a little. Let me know if this is better. Curse me an my large resolution monitor. ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resolute (talk • contribs) 04:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hehe, well I have a 37 inch widescreen monitor but when i use the internet I often resize the window to 1024x768 since most websites are designed for that resolution. --Krm500 15:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I shrunk the image a little. Let me know if this is better. Curse me an my large resolution monitor. ;) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Resolute (talk • contribs) 04:12, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Mike Commodore became a cult hero during the 2004 Stanley Cup Playoffs as a result of his unruly red hair and steady defensive play" Without a citation, this is a problem. As citations in captions are weird, try to say something factual that can not be challenged, like he played on the stanley cup winning team, or played x games with the Flames, or something like that.--Serte [ Talk · Contrib ] 10:15, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good point. I've changed the wording. Apologies for taking so long to reply. Resolute 23:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Good work, same quality as the other two articles. Kaiser matias 21:21, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks great! Drewcifer 21:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks okay. Did some extra clearing out. Circeus 02:20, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I really like what Circeus did. I just created three columns in the Key section to get rid of the whitespace.--Crzycheetah 07:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]