Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of British Columbia general elections
Appearance
- Wikipedia's best work: Provides information in a format that cannot be found elsewhere on the internet.
- Useful, comprehensive, factually accurate, stable, and well-organised:
- Useful: Summarises information from 38 seperate articles, and allows visitors to easily compare results from successive general elections
- Comprehensive: Covers every general election
- Factually accurate: can be verified via BC Elections
- Stable: Will be only be updated every four years
- Well-organised: Easy to find any required information
- Uncontroversial: no edit wars or disuptes of any kind, ever
- Standards / style manual: Layout is clear and concise
- Images: Sole image has approriate copyright status
This was a Good Article until they stopped accepting lists. The arricle had a peer review, and the few suggestions made have been acted on. Tompw 14:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - just format the reference using {{cite web}}. I see a bunch of FL comming... Renata 14:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Done. Very prescient of you :-) Tompw 15:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- support complete and useful Hmains 18:03, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support; very good and well sourced. Laïka 18:16, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Can you tabulate the Elections prior to provincial political parties as has been done for Manitoba? I don't think this list can be said to be comprehensive until you've done this! --G Rutter 20:22, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- There were no political parties in BC prior to 1903, hence why pre-1903 elections are not included in the "Summary of results by party" table... it wouldn't make sense! There are linked via the section below, so the list is definately comprehensive (just rather boring before 1903). However, I have shifted the "notes" section below the pre-1903 material, so that it links togther better. Tompw 20:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've just realised you mean the government/oposition table... will look at Elections BC and see if there's details. Tompw 20:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Done :-) Tompw 21:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- I've just realised you mean the government/oposition table... will look at Elections BC and see if there's details. Tompw 20:58, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- There were no political parties in BC prior to 1903, hence why pre-1903 elections are not included in the "Summary of results by party" table... it wouldn't make sense! There are linked via the section below, so the list is definately comprehensive (just rather boring before 1903). However, I have shifted the "notes" section below the pre-1903 material, so that it links togther better. Tompw 20:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Excellent! Sorry for not making myself clearer originally; I had also checked to see whether it would be possible! --G Rutter 22:23, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support - The reference was just to the general election site rather than to the historical stats, but I fixed that for you. Otherwise excellent list. --Arctic Gnome 18:53, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support Perhaps wikilink unicameral in these lists? Colin°Talk 23:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)