Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/CZW World Heavyweight Championship/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 19 days, 4 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Tompw (talk) (review) 15:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As fully referenced and detailed as possible (which was quite a task for a rather complicated indy title), descriptive lead, good free use image. --MarcK 16:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, an article should simply be created for Nick Berk, it's the only sore thumb in there. -- Phoenix2 (holla) 01:05, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --MarcK 05:42, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think it's necessary to make the notes small, especially the inline citations. I just don't see the numbers. And it's hard to click on them.--Crzycheetah 07:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]- It's like that on other similar FLs, and nobody else has complained about it, so I think it may just be your eyes (no offense). --MarcK 17:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- My eyes are fine. I still think that inline citations does not need to be small. Take a look at this FL, under "NBA Team" column, there are small notes, but inline citations are not. --Crzycheetah 18:07, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I've decided it doesn't really hurt the article either way, so Done --MarcK 10:59, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It's like that on other similar FLs, and nobody else has complained about it, so I think it may just be your eyes (no offense). --MarcK 17:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thank you. --Crzycheetah 18:18, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I have never really taken part in too many nomination or judging processes, and this article is terribly small, so I looked over the criteria of a Featured List: It must be useful, comprehensive, factually accurate, stable, uncontroversial and well-constructed. I think this fits our CZW list here because it can be used to link to the actual wrestlers usefully, it covers the title's history, and it shouldn't be in controversy or change because it is from primary web sources, so I support it as a Featured Article List.--Screwball23 talk 02:35, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Excellent work - very well referenced. Tompw (talk) (review) 15:51, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]