Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Audioslave discography
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:Scorpion0422 21:24, 27 December 2008 [1].
After a big cleanup, I think that is better, and decent to receive comments, etc. Cannibaloki 18:50, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - it is way better than the previous FLC, the only thing is that I would like to see the lead expanded by adding more about Audioslave itself: ie. memebers, how the formation came about.--SRX 21:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done, and what is "memebers", a Gremlins dialect?=P Cannibaloki 00:15, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- "Several vocalists jammed with the three, until the producer Rick Rubin suggested that they jam with former Soundgarden vocalist, Chris Cornell." What does "jam" mean here?
- Nothing.
- "The quartet
then,began working"- Done.
- "After tossing around the idea of being called "Civilian"" "tossing around"-->considering.
- Done.
- Why are there See also links to the Rage against the Machine and Soundgarden discographies? Dabomb87 (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:40, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There appears to a live EP missing[2][3]. Despite Amazon giving it a different name, it seems to be referred to as Live EP most of the time. --JD554 (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- After a search, I found none reliable sources covering a news about this release. Purchase This Specially Priced 4 Track Unreleased Live EP And Receive $1.99 Off Audioslave's New Album "Revelations" In Stores 9/05/06. Per this message, I conclude that this EP is not notable, because was sold only to give a discount on the Audioslave's next album. Regards, Cannibaloki 16:27, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Udonknome (talk):
This is an almost support for me, with only a few comments. This should be easy:
- Love the lead!!
- Thank you very much. =)
- For the studio albums table, I suggest you move citation [8] under the US and CAN columns for consistency with the other ones. Ditto for [25] in the singles table.
- Ah, when you see a reference like this, means that it is generally for this table or section, and covers all information (minus those with other references to verify the information).
- Yeah I know that, but what other information does that citation cover other than the charts for US and Canada? Do U(knome)? yes...or no 21:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Only the US and CAN. Cannibaloki 22:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah I know that, but what other information does that citation cover other than the charts for US and Canada? Do U(knome)? yes...or no 21:40, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, when you see a reference like this, means that it is generally for this table or section, and covers all information (minus those with other references to verify the information).
- In the certification box of Audioslave, I don't think wikilinks such as
[[RIAA|US]]
are necessary, hence why we link to the list of music certifications by country.- I corrected these links. "...the list of music certifications by country...", is used to exemplify the number of releases which needed to an album be certified in a country, as the name suggests.
- In the singles table, are Austria, France, Germany and Ireland necessary? The band seems to have charted there once with "Be Yourself", in less-than-mediocre positions. It would also be a good opportunity to reduce the number of charts.
- I used the twelve best chart positions for the studio albums table, and the same for singles table. See how the width is equal. (In short, is a visual appeal.)
- In the video albums table, you might want to change
! Notes
to!style="font-size:90%"|US Music<br />Videos chart
or something similar to that, so that you can then replace all those words with a number!- Done.
After doing a review for another open FLC and feeling a bit like a jerk, I'm glad I've found something easy to review. Do U(knome)? yes...or no 23:17, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review. Cannibaloki 03:53, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.