Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/72nd Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
72nd Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This list is my second FL nomination for a Creative Arts ceremony, following the 73rd Primetime Creative Arts Emmy Awards; my work here has been heavily modeled on that list. The list also pairs with the 72nd Primetime Emmy Awards, which was itself promoted to FL recently, to fully cover the Emmys* for this year. (*Okay, just the Primetime Emmys, not all of the other, lesser-known ceremonies, but you get the idea.) Assuming this goes well, I'd like to keep going with the awards for the 71st ceremony. All feedback is appreciated! RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:17, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Birdienest81
[edit]I can't really find anything wrong with this list. The only thing I would suggest is mentioning that host Nicole Byer hosted her part of the show from the Television Academy's headquarters in North Hollywood, California. Here are some sources to back that fact up.[2][3][4]. Other than that this list earns my support.
By the way, I was thinking that sometime in October, you could help me copyedit the 62nd and 64th Primetime Emmy Awards in preparation for featured list promotion.
- --Birdienest81talk 09:57, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Birdienest81: Done. As to the other lists, I'd be more than happy to help! Just message me on my talk page when you're interested. RunningTiger123 (talk) 13:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Pseud 14
[edit]Great work on this Emmy Awards list (as usual). Nothing to nitpick about, except for one very minor comment really, in the 'Nominations and wins by program' tables since the 'Network' column is sortable, every instance should be linked, as you did with the tables on 'wins by network'. That's all I have. Pseud 14 (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Pseud 14: Done. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:39, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Pseud 14 (talk) 14:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- If you have some spare time or inclination, would appreciate feedback on my FLC as well. Though not mandatory at all.
Aoba47
[edit]- The American link in American prime time television seems like overlinking to me since it is a location that a majority if not all Wikipedia readers are at least familiar with.
- How about linking to Television in the United States, as the main Primetime Emmy Awards article does? That would be a useful link and it currently doesn't exist in the list.
- That makes sense. Aoba47 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- How about linking to Television in the United States, as the main Primetime Emmy Awards article does? That would be a useful link and it currently doesn't exist in the list.
- I think it would be beneficial to link streaming in the lead. While it is quite ubiquitous at this point, it would still be helpful as a resource for some readers who want to learn more about the subject.
- Done.
- This is more of a FAC note than a FLC one, but I would avoid sentence structures like: with Nicole Byer hosting the event (i.e. with X verb-ing). I have primarily seen this note in the FAC space so I am not sure it translates over here as well, but I've been told avoid this in featured content.
- Done (in two places).
Wonderful work with the list. I could only find very minor, nitpick-y things for my review. Once everything has been addressed, I will be more than happy to support this FAC for promotion. Have a wonderful day! Aoba47 (talk) 01:29, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: Replies above; thanks for the review! RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:15, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing everything. I support this FLC for promotion based on the prose. If possible, I would appreciate any feedback on my current FAC, but either way, I hope you have a great weekend! Aoba47 (talk) 17:54, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – All of the sources are sufficiently reliable and well-formatted, and no dead links were detected by the link-checker tool. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:20, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Image review – All photographs have appropriate free licenses and alt text. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:18, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.