Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/52nd Academy Awards/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 15 August 2022 (UTC) [1].[reply]
52nd Academy Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Birdienest81talk 09:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating the 1980 Oscars for featured list because we believe it has great potential to become a Featured List. I followed how the 1929, 1979, 1981, 1984, 1986, 1987, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 ceremonies were written. Birdienest81talk 09:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I got nothing at all. Great work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:04, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by RunningTiger123
[edit]- "23 categories" – I count 22? (Unless the Special Achievement Award counts, I can't remember)
- Duration in infobox needs better source if possible (source 25 is okay but not great)
- Any reason ratings are omitted from infobox when other years include them?
- "posthumous nomination" – citation needed
- "E=MC2 mon amour" should be written as "E=mc² mon amour", based on this French Wikipedia article and other sources
- "Its So Nice..." → "It's So Nice..."
- I think the ceremony was nominated for some Emmys per this, but I'll search for more sources to confirm.
- Update: This Hollywood Reporter article confirms it, I can add the information later. RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @RunningTiger123: - Done: I have read your comments and have responded to them by making the proper adjustments based on them. Thank you.
Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 01:32, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Z1720
[edit]No prose concerns
- Source review
- Version reviewed
- Ref 29: If this is a single page, it should be "p", not "pp"
- Image review
- No licencing concerns
- No caption concerns
- No formatting concerns
Please ping when the source review comment is addressed. Thanks, Z1720 (talk) 01:02, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Z1720: Done: Fixed the page number by change the field from plural to singular.
- --Birdienest81talk 09:42, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. No other concerns. Z1720 (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Cowlibob
[edit]- Would it be possible to mention who won the Big Five in the lead as that is what most people looking at this article will look for
- Also a summary of the critical reception that the ceremony received would be useful in the lead and the ratings/viewership compared to the previous year.
- The Johnny Carson pic alttext probably needs more description like "A black and white photograph of Johnny Carson in 1970" Cowlibob (talk) 12:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Cowlibob: Done -- Thanks for the comments.
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:08, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.