Wikipedia:Featured article review/S.H.E/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria at 14:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Review commentary
[edit]S.H.E (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Notified: Pandacomics, WikiProject Pop music, WikiProject Taiwan
I am nominating this featured article for review because I believe there are certain issues I can't handle myself. I will list them below:
- The lead is too brief and does not conform WP:LEAD, nor criteria 2a.
- The majority of the references are not accessible (dead links), which makes the prose hard to verify.
- The prose has some errors; namely the last heading of the history sections and some paragraphs in the music style (criteria 1a and 1b)
- The audio files are not according to WP:SAMPLE, contradicting the third FA criteria.
I am not familiar with this topic, so I'll need input from the parties involved in the previous FAC to resolve the problems. All the best.--Retrohead (talk) 07:45, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
FARC commentary
[edit]- Concerns raised in the review section included prose, media, referencing, and organization/coverage. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:50, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist I concur with Retrohead, this is not FA material at all for the reasons he gave. The "lyrics" subsection of "musical style" also seems rather short compared to the rest of the section. SNUGGUMS (talk · contribs) 02:55, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist as nominator and because no subsequent work has been done to improve the article.--Retrohead (talk) 09:05, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist It fails FA criteria, and it seems the major contributors wanna let it go.Forbidden User (talk) 11:35, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 14:29, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.