Wikipedia:Featured article review/Kappa Kappa Psi/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 0:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: Sycamore [2], Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities [3], Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Marching band, [4]
Review section
[edit]I've never started an FAR before but I came across this completely by accident (I was bored and clicked "random featured article" on WP:FA). Had it not been for the maintenance tag at top, I probably would have moved on fairly quickly but the tag appears valid to me. The article is built almost entirely around what the organisation says about itself; most substantive content appears to be referenced to the organisation itself or its own publication. There are third-party sources cited, including several books, but these appear to have a broader scope so I would imagine their coverage is relatively brief and they are cited much less frequently. Nominator has been inactive for over five years, concerns were raised on the talk page (and the tag placed) three weeks ago with no response. Writing standard is good and everything else seems to be in order but I have serious concerns about 1c, which makes it difficult to assess 1b and 1d. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 10:41, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC I agree with HJ Mitchell's concern about the overuse of primary sources (t · c) buidhe 15:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to FARC per above. Hog Farm Talk 15:22, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Issues raised in the review section largely concern sourcing. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:04, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Tagged as lacking reliable sources. DrKay (talk) 18:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist cleanup tag and issues discussed above still present. (t · c) buidhe 21:07, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - as noted above, this is way too reliant on primary sources. Hog Farm Talk 02:21, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.