Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/L. Paul Bremer
- Article is no longer a featured article.
this article is so short that it is more a stub than a featured article. how did it become a featured article at all??? just make a comparison with some other featured biography Avala 19:00, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep - David Gerard 19:11, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- please explain Avala 19:25, 4 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- It's substantially bigger than a stub; is there more that could be said about this individual? — Matt 09:01, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. The comment that this is a stub is extreme hyperbole. DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:40, Jul 13, 2004 (UTC)
- Similar length to Horatio Nelson (which has an atrocious lead section). The "Trivia" section could be expanded upon, but I don't think that's enough to support delisting. Keep. Johnleemk | Talk 11:58, 28 Jul 2004 (UTC)
- On second thought, SUPPORT REMOVAL. Hades itself may be under ice by the time his book comes out, Y.B. 8/20/2004
- Support removal. It doesn't have good external links, crucial to evaluating the accuracy and NPOV of a bio, doesn't discuss third parties' vies of Bremer's tenure in any of his posts, is shorter on detail than the standard FA bio, and could use better subsectioning & layout. On the other hand, seeing this article makes me feel bad about putting war elephants up for removal. +sj+ 20:27, 10 Aug 2004 (UTC)
- It's still here. There should be more written about the Coalition Provisional Authority instead. Y.B. 8/24/2004