Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/History of Greenland

History of Greenland

Article is still a featured article.

A great topic, but I am reluctantly nominating it for removal. It lacks citations and sources. Hydriotaphia 22:49, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Remove per nom, unless citations are added. Current revision has one inline external link and one citation. !mAtt™ 23:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)

• Remove I regret I must agree. Articles without references and citations should not be FAs. --Jayzel68 16:00, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

• I take back my vote due to comments below. --Jayzel 17:04, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• Note that, on the featured article nomination page, the original author/nominator states that he used the "external links" as references. Therefore, most of the information is probably attributable. The article can be fixed. bcasterline ^talk 23:44, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

• Nice catch. It appears from the nom that there certainly were sources used, including a print source, so I've asked the original author to cite them properly. That should solve the problem. I would encourage people to exhaust every way to improve (or get other people to improve) an article before listing it on FARC. - Taxman ^Talk 10:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

• I added a couple of footnotes by converting an external link and another note. AndyZ 21:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep now that the article is improving --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 21:40, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep now. Andrew Levine 08:00, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

• Keep I have added another reference and renumbered them. [[Judgesurreal777 20:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)]]

• And if I could remove my nomination, I would! I vote to keep. Hydriotaphia 05:15, 27 February 2006 (UTC)