Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/William Henry Harrison
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted by SandyGeorgia 04:27, 7 March 2009 [1].
US President, the one with the shortest term, and military leader. I'm a WikiCup participant. — Rlevse • Talk • 22:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Restart, old nom, images and sources reviewed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:51, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ref format comments -- Issue found with WP:REFTOOLS.
<ref name = o219220>Owens, p. 219–220</ref> | This should have the p. 219-220 as "pp. 219-220"--TRUCO 16:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Fixed. Charles Edward (Talk) 16:36, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The dabs need fixing.--TRUCO 17:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WHich dab? — Rlevse • Talk • 17:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The ones found using the dab tools (located in the toolbox to your right).--TRUCO 18:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Dabs, ref formatting, and external links found up to speed.--TRUCO 00:33, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed. — Rlevse • Talk • 18:12, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The ones found using the dab tools (located in the toolbox to your right).--TRUCO 18:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- WHich dab? — Rlevse • Talk • 17:48, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - finally, an FAC in an area that I at least know something about. I think the term "military leader" could be confusing. Normally, "officer" is used in the vague sense. The "Tecumseh and Tippecanoe" could really use a picture to break it up. Are there any portraits of the battle or area? Of the individuals? The Tecumseh, Tenskwatawa, and Tecumseh's War seem to have some. The "Public office" subheading under "Post-war life" seems unnecessary. The picture in "1840 presidential campaign" is formatting against blockquotes, which I think is not supposed to happen (but I don't remember if it is stated that it can't happen, someone can verify). The "Administration and cabinet" stood out, but not in a good way. The chart on the Lincoln page seems to be even scarier, so, if any changes happen, please don't go in -that- direction. There is a picture formatting under "Death", on the left, which would cause problems with WP:ACCESS. I suggest making the death section a level two header and having the next two sections as subheadings under it. Ottava Rima (talk) 14:57, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did most of this. Not sure what you mean by the rest. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Haha, I'm not sure what "the rest" means in this case. Anything in particular that is confusing? :) Ottava Rima (talk) 17:09, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Did most of this. Not sure what you mean by the rest. — Rlevse • Talk • 16:15, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Even better this time around. Good use of sub pages. Sumoeagle179 (talk) 17:06, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great article! Reywas92Talk 22:54, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thorough and well wrote, this is ready! Charles Edward (Talk) 23:25, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Having supported the first time, I'm glad to see the previous FAC concerns have been addressed. JGHowes talk 23:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm curious: What makes you believe the previous concerns were addressed? Is it because the nomination was "restarted"? —Kevin Myers 02:50, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The prose is more polished now, compared to my previous review (and some c/e) on Feb. 13, and overall the article is comprehensive, well organized, and nicely laid out, in my view (see diff). JGHowes talk 23:07, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I'd be able to list a few nit-picky things, but all in all, this is a comprehensive and encyclopedic account of Harrison. A few disclaimers: I'm a WikiCup competitor. Also, I did quite a bit of copyediting on this particular article prior to its initial nomination, but it appears the text has been altered significantly since then. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 03:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.