Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/TV (song)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Gog the Mild via FACBot (talk) 8 October 2022 [1].
- Nominator(s): โ โ Your Power ๐ โ โ ๐ฌ "What did I tell you?"
๐ "Don't get complacent..." 10:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
At this point, everyone and their grandma knows about Johnny Depp v. Amber Heard. I think many of us have a few hot takes surrounding the situation; Billie Eilish seems to be one of those people. She thinks that the explosive media popularity around the trial was extremely unjustified - so much so that she wrote a whole line in a song, "TV", comparing it to the (in her view) relatively silent online reaction about the Dobbs draft leak.
But "TV" is more than just an ode to politics or publicized celebrity drama. It is also an exploration of disillusionment and numbness, about trying to distract yourself as the world around you crumbles to dust.
I've been on a spree of improving Billie Eilish articles lately. Here is the second one I am taking to FAC. This one is about a recently released song, but it was surprised-released and has fallen off major charts that the article shall hopefully remain stable for many months. โ โ Your Power ๐ โ โ ๐ฌ "What did I tell you?"
๐ "Don't get complacent..." 10:09, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Image review (pass)
[edit]- File:BillieEilishO2160622 (44 of 45) (52152978743) (cropped).jpg: The image has appropriate ALT text and a clear purpose in the article. I would include the year that the photo was taken to the caption to provide the full context to readers. I would also archive the source and author links for this image to avoid any potential headaches in the future with link rot and death. However, to be absolutely clear, neither of these two points are required for a FAC so that does not hold up this image review. They are more suggestions than requirements.
- This is outside the scope of an image review, but I was curious if there were any negative reviews of the song?
This passes my image review. I did have two brief suggestions on how to improve the only image used in the article, and I did have a single prose question about the reviews as I was somewhat surprised about there being apparently no negative or even mixed reviews to this song. Aoba47 (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Aoba47! Thank you for all the diligent work you do at FAC, and ofc thank you for this review in particular. The image caption has been tweaked. I tried including archive links for the source, but the image isn't showing up in the archived version for some reason. Will get to it eventually. Though I suppose the green verified template on the file's licensing section on Commons should do enough to assuage worries wrt source validity?"
- About the reviews - I cannot find one single negative review about the song. TBH there were few full-fledged reviews of the song - I think the Nylon and Guardian articles come the closest to such - but there were enough articles that included opinions about "TV" that there was an emerging, seemingly unanimous consensus about the song's quality. Many people liked it because of the lyrics; no one said anything remotely critical. A reception section does not necessarily have to include criticism or negativity to be considered neutral and balanced, after all
Once again thank you for the comments! โ โ Your Power ๐ โ โ ๐ฌ "What did I tell you?"
๐ "Don't get complacent..." 04:32, 16 September 2022 (UTC)- Thank you for your responses. There should not be any issues with the images. Archiving the source and author link is more of a suggestion than a requirement. I was only curious if there were any mixed or negative reviews because when I read the article, I must admit that I did find some things I did not enjoy about the song, but that is just my personal opinion. I did not mean to imply that the article was not comprehensive or the like. It is likely the case that the music critics who did cover the song had positive reviews for it. I'd also imagine that some critics would feel uncomfortable posting a negative review about this song given its topic or fear any potential blowback for critiquing a popular artist. Anyway, apologies for rambling and best of luck with the FAC! Aoba47 (talk) 05:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Aoba47 - those are completely fair assessmentsย :) glad we're on the same page here โ โ Your Power ๐ โ โ ๐ฌ "What did I tell you?"
๐ "Don't get complacent..." 05:21, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Aoba47 - those are completely fair assessmentsย :) glad we're on the same page here โ โ Your Power ๐ โ โ ๐ฌ "What did I tell you?"
- Thank you for your responses. There should not be any issues with the images. Archiving the source and author link is more of a suggestion than a requirement. I was only curious if there were any mixed or negative reviews because when I read the article, I must admit that I did find some things I did not enjoy about the song, but that is just my personal opinion. I did not mean to imply that the article was not comprehensive or the like. It is likely the case that the music critics who did cover the song had positive reviews for it. I'd also imagine that some critics would feel uncomfortable posting a negative review about this song given its topic or fear any potential blowback for critiquing a popular artist. Anyway, apologies for rambling and best of luck with the FAC! Aoba47 (talk) 05:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- Maybe wikilink Manchester both times it is used. As Eilish is American, people might not initially make the connection with the city in the UK
- "speaking about writing the lyrics after the first verse in hindsight" - should this be "speaking in hindsight about writing the lyrics after the first verse"?
- "12 days later" => "Twelve days later"
- "She sings about "sinking in the sofa while we all betray each other,"" - think that comma should be outside the quote marks
- Done all fourย :)
- "In particular, entertainment columnists for the Manila Bulletin" - multiple columnists from the same paper?
- Most likely - the article's byline says "Manila Bulletin Entertainment", and if there was a single author I think they would have spelled it out.
- Think that's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments @ChrisTheDude - I've responded to your suggestions above. I hope you enjoyed the read
โ โ Your Power ๐ โ โ ๐ฌ "What did I tell you?"
๐ "Don't get complacent..." 16:08, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comments @ChrisTheDude - I've responded to your suggestions above. I hope you enjoyed the read
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 06:03, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Coordinator comment
[edit]Three weeks in and just the single general support. Unless this nomination makes significant further progress towards a consensus to promote over the next three or four days I am afraid that it is liable to be archived. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
- Regretfully, this nomination has timed out. The usual two-week hiatus will apply.
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Gog the Mild (talk) 21:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.