Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Kingdom Hearts
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was promoted 00:00, 16 July 2007.
This article is a self nomination. I've been tidying it up for a few weeks now and I believe that article is worthy of a Featured Article, as with most of the Star Wars films and most of the Final Fantasy video game series. This article has had a peer review by the CVG WikiProject which has a link at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Peer_review/Kingdom_Hearts. Thanks. Greg Jones II 17:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Looks very good, meets the criteria. Judgesurreal777 22:29, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Good, concise article that follows the four FA criteria and it's already a good article --AutoGyro 23:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Haven't played this yet (only Chain of Memories), but I remember that this article used to be in bad shape, and since it went through such improvement, it's worthy of the FA. And maybe later the Kingdom Hearts games can become an FT. igordebraga ≠ 00:20, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Conditional Support - It's well-referenced, but I think at least three of the fair-use images are missing their sources. — Blue。 08:08, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The images are adequately sourced, for images such as screenshots and cover scans, it is the copyright holder which is important, not whoever pressed print screen. Other editors have sufficient information to be able to verify if the screenshots/scans are accurate.
- All right. Will change to support once the issue below is resolved. — Blue。 09:39, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The images are adequately sourced, for images such as screenshots and cover scans, it is the copyright holder which is important, not whoever pressed print screen. Other editors have sufficient information to be able to verify if the screenshots/scans are accurate.
- Oppose - It's a Japanese game, where's the Japanese critical reception? (Famitsu) As a minor aside, could you not get some better screenshots? Image:Neo Shadow.jpg seems blurry and of a strange resolution. - hahnchen 09:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I fixed a link here. Greg Jones II 14:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- We will get better images ASAP. We also need Japanese reception as well as Japanese voice casts. I will address your objection ASAP. Greg Jones II 13:37, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Once I address your objection, I will continue this nomination. Greg Jones II 13:41, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Japanese critical reception has been cited. Greg Jones II 17:03, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, wait, we need to find a few more sources for Japanese critical receptions before this nomination continues. Greg Jones II 17:06, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can we find a Famitsu score for this one? Would complement the Japanese critical receptions. — Blue。 12:58, 11 July 2007 (UTC)Found it. — Blue。 16:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Dude, you rock, Thank you for finding that. Is the current information on the Japanese reception enough? (Guyinblack25 17:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- See below comment. — Blue。 00:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Dude, you rock, Thank you for finding that. Is the current information on the Japanese reception enough? (Guyinblack25 17:54, 11 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- I've added a hidden message to the top of the plot remiding other users not to add unneccessary information. This should stop many other users from doing so. The Japanese critical reception from Famitsu and Dengeki online has now been cited. About the screenshots, we need a better resolution and fair use rationales as well before this nomination can continue. Thanks. Greg Jones II 21:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All images have a fair use rationale and are web resolution. For the screen captures, is their current state a problem for FA? If so we can try to get other screen shots. (Guyinblack25 02:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- I am not sure about the Japanese critical reception or the screen captures if there are problems for FA. Greg Jones II 22:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sjones, just flesh out and describe some of the comments on the camera system. The screen capture is fitting as following the recent fairuse policy. — Blue。 22:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, Blue. All of the photos look fine. If there is a current state a problem for FA, as described above by Guyinblack25, we can try to get other screenshots. Otherwise, most of this article looks perfect for an FA. Greg Jones II 23:06, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Sjones, just flesh out and describe some of the comments on the camera system. The screen capture is fitting as following the recent fairuse policy. — Blue。 22:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not sure about the Japanese critical reception or the screen captures if there are problems for FA. Greg Jones II 22:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- All images have a fair use rationale and are web resolution. For the screen captures, is their current state a problem for FA? If so we can try to get other screen shots. (Guyinblack25 02:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- Comment: To anyone who understands Japanese, this sentence needs more fleshing out from the source: "Dengeki Online also complained about the camera." What kind of complain? What is the problem with the camera? What did they suggest? This would better describe the Japanese reception. — Blue。 00:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, we could use some help on this one before this nomination continues. Greg Jones II 18:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.