Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/King Crimson/archive1

King Crimson

Support Fairly concise, well-written, and a good overview on the band. User:Fractured_leader (added 3:10 UTC, June 20, 2006)

Object. Due to lack of in-line citations and references, and too many one-sentence paragraphs. RyanG e rbil10 (Drop on in!) 04:38, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. per RyanGeril10, also no 'see also' section. Rlevse 15:28, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- there are a number of editors who argue that a "See also" section is an indication of an unfinished article, as a collection of wikilinks to subjects that should have been mentioned but are not. Jkelly 18:20, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Remove excessive links to solitary months and solitary years. Fixing this is easy with a single click on a 'dates' tab in edit mode. You can then accept or reject the changes offered and/or do more editing before pressing 'Save'. Simply copy the entire contents of User:Bobblewik/monobook.js to your own monobook. Then follow the instructions in your monobook to clear the cache (i.e. press Ctrl-Shift-R in Firefox, or Ctrl-F5 in IE) before it will work. bobblewik 17:24, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. FU images have no fair use rationales. feydey 13:22, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]