Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Iron Man/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 31 May 2024 [1].
- Nominator(s): Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
When engineering genius Tony Stark was kidnapped and forced to build a weapon, he turned the tables on his kidnappers by designing a powered suit of armor and fighting his way out. With this new armor, he pledged to fight evil as the superhero Iron Man! First created by Marvel Comics in 1963, Iron Man has since become one of the company's most popular characters, in no small part because of his central role in Marvel's films. In the 60 years since Iron Man was first created, the character has appeared in countless comic book stories and other media, commenting on issues like Cold War politics, alcoholism, and technological progress.
There's little precedent for comic book superheroes as featured articles. The topic area is rife with articles that depend on primary sources and go into excessive detail, both things that I had to address when I began working on this article. I've cleaned out the comic book citations entirely, replacing them with analytic, scholarly sources, supplemented by reviews, news articles, and character handbooks to fill in the details. I'm hoping that by refining this article to FA standards, it will create such a precedent for other articles in the comic book topic area. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Image review from Nikkimaria
[edit]- Suggest adding alt text
- File:Iron_Man_(circa_2018).png needs a more expansive FUR. Ditto File:Tales_of_Suspense_39.jpg, File:Iron_Man's_armors.jpg
- File:TalesOfSuspense48.jpg: source link is dead. Nikkimaria (talk) 04:12, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Alt text added, source link replaced, and non-free use rationale improved for File:Iron_Man_(circa_2018).png. I don't see any missing non-free use information for File:Tales_of_Suspense_39.jpg or File:Iron_Man's_armors.jpg. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 04:59, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
- Generally speaking, the more non-free content is included, the stronger the rationale required for each. These rationales have no empty fields, but they are also not strong enough to justify having so much non-free media. Nikkimaria (talk) 05:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Drive-by comments from BOZ
[edit]- Comment: "I'm hoping that by refining this article to FA standards, it will create such a precedent for other articles in the comic book topic area.". I hope so too. :) There are a great many comic book characters, superheroes having dominated the field for most of the media's existence, that have this kind of potential; right now at GA we currently have Captain America, Joker (character), Norman Osborn, and Spider-Man which have the most potential for FA, and several others that are GA but may not be suitable for FA, and easily dozens of other characters that could be GA or better if someone could find the time and energy to find the sources and basically rewrite them from scratch. Batman and Superman are former FA articles, so it would be nice to see a comics character back up there. BOZ (talk) 06:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Comments by ZKang123
[edit]I thought the film was being reviewed. That said, I shall review this article to the best of my ability.
No problems with the lead I can find.
Creation and premiere:
- "superhero comic books" – would it make a difference to just say "superhero comics"? Just want to make it more general, succinct and referring to the genre.
- "designing an unlikeable character and making him likeable." – suggest changing the connector "and" to "while"
- "Lee described the national mood toward Vietnam in which Iron Man was created as" – This chunk is worded rather weirdly. Would suggest "Lee described the national mood toward Vietnam at the time "when..." "
- "Heck continued as the primary Iron Man artist until 1965, as Kirby had obligations to other Marvel properties." – "Until 1965, Heck continued as the primary Iron Man artist, as Kirby had obligations to other Marvel properties." I find the initial wording a little confusing as it seems the reasoning was due to his tenure until 1965, and not exactly Heck's tenure itself.
More to come.--ZKang123 (talk) 02:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi ZKang123, just checking if further comments are on their way? Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:17, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will get back to this. A bit busy these days with other things at the moment.--ZKang123 (talk) 01:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Support from Aoba47
[edit]Resolved comments from Aoba47
|
---|
I hope these comments are helpful. Once everything has been addressed, I will do a more thorough read-through of the article. Best of luck with the FAC. Aoba47 (talk) 16:51, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Here are some additional comments. I hope they are helpful. I will look through the article again later today. Thank you for your patience. I just want to make sure I look through the article as thoroughly as possible. Aoba47 (talk) 01:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I believe this should be the end of my review. Best of luck with the FAC! Aoba47 (talk) 15:04, 7 April 2024 (UTC) |
- Aoba47 I've replied to all of the above comments. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for addressing everything. I support this FAC for promotion. I hope this review is helpful. I do have one quick additional comment. I would link Marvel Comics, superhero, and American comic books the first time that they are used in the article to be consistent with how they are linked in the lead. It is not a major point though so it does not hold up my support. Aoba47 (talk) 15:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Support from Igordebraga
[edit]- Support Impressive work. Considering the only comic book character FA is Anarky, is good to see one that is worth a promotion. igordebraga ≠ 18:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Igordebraga, just to clarify, you didn't see any details or any aspect that might need to be changed to best meet the featured article criteria? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Reading it extensively, could only find one issue, and it's less about the FA criteria than article consistency: the character biography ends on Infamous Iron Man, but the publication history above mentions the series that followed that. I understand that it's because it was the latest story on the ref (Marvel Encyclopedia), yet it still makes that section incomplete. If a reliable source summing up at least Tony Stark: Iron Man could be found, it would be very helpful. igordebraga ≠ 04:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Igordebraga, just to clarify, you didn't see any details or any aspect that might need to be changed to best meet the featured article criteria? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 20:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Support from PMC
[edit]Resolved comments from PMC
|
---|
Putting myself down here. If I don't get to it within a week, feel free to give me the gears. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Okay, that's all I have for now. For the most part, the article is really well-written, and there are plenty of places I had little-to-nothing to criticize. My biggest thing is the organization of the Personality section, but as I said above, given the complexity involved, I'm open to discussion. Take your time responding. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
|
- Premeditated Chaos, I think that should be everything. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 07:02, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thebiguglyalien, thanks for your patience waiting for me to respond. I've reviewed the changes and have basically no outstanding concerns. The personality section in particular reads really smoothly now. The one thing is the Justin Hammer sentence fragment, which I've left a comment under, but it's small and I assume you'll fix it shortly, so I'm a support. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:26, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Oppose by David Fuchs
[edit]Recusing to review, comments will be here shortly. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 17:47, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
Switching to oppose after a review. I think the article's a very good start, but I have issues throughout:
- The prose just isn't there for me. It's often weirdly structured in ways that make it unclear what the text is trying to say, or is just unnecessarily wordy. Some examples: "Ditko was responsible for only three issues in late 1963, but in this time he had Iron Man's suit redesigned with the red and gold color scheme that became the character's primary image" — "had" shows up constantly in this article for no reason, and here it makes it sound like Ditko got someone else to redesign the suit as opposed to being the primary illustrator and theoretically the one actually doing it? Likewise "Michelinie and Layton replaced many elements that had developed in the series" makes it sound like elements just developed out of the aether and weren't conscious choices. There's a lot of passive voice that doesn't seem necessary, e.g. "and the design was modified by Heck to incorporate gadgets such as jets, drills, and suction cups", or just minor extra fluff like "he seeks out all
ofthe other armors", "Iron Manhas himself injectedinjects himself with the Extremis virus"- A lot of this feels like a difference in style preferences, but I've done a few passes of copyediting on the article to remove words. I think a lot of the "had" and similar words help with the flow, but I see where you're coming from. I'm also of the opinion that passive voice isn't as much of an issue as it's sometimes made out to be, but that should be fixed. One minor point, "Iron Man injects himself with the Extremis virus" would be incorrect. He had himself injected, and I reworded so it's clearer.
- There's some flow issues in the publication history; we get a "creation and premiere" section that goes to 1964, but then we get a heading that says "late 1960s" and doesn't say when The Avengers was started, which adds to the confusion because 1963 ain't the late 1960s, and neither is 1965 by my reckoning. "Growing opposition to the war" and the rest likewise don't have any real temporal signposts. The 1970s section starts with "Over the years, the letters to the editor column in several issues saw extensive political debate" but there's no elaboration. The next sentence is about creative turnover and it doesn't return to the idea of fans debating politics in the issues. A lot of the content in the personality section either is duplicative of content in the publication history, or else feels like it's best put there. Likewise content in the themes and motifs feels like it often should be introduced earlier. ("The armor was gray in its first appearance, but Iron Man gave it gold plating in the subsequent issue"... this is already briefly covered in less detail earlier, but it feels like it belongs there more, and also "Iron Man gave it gold plating" makes no sense.) Ditto the cultural legacy section, the first couple sentences is again just saying the same thing we've heard two times before in brief about the military associations.
- I've rearranged 1960s info to put it in chronological order. This is definitely something I should have caught before nominating. I've moved up some of the info from personality and themes and integrated it into the publication history. I have regrets about some of that info not being covered in their respective sections, but it works better in regard to organization. I believe that a couple sentences about the military connections are appropriate for the reception section, as that's really the core of his early reception.
- The fictional character biography lurches from past to present tense; I can understand using past tense for the character background, but going from "This prosthesis is hacked and controlled remotely, causing neurological damage that appears for a time to kill him" (present) to "Rhodes temporarily became Stark's chosen successor as Iron Man." (Past) to "After returning, Stark falls under the control of Immortus, turning him evil. " in three sentences just reads badly.
- I fixed up the tense in this section, but three changes of tense in three sentences is just another way of saying that there was one sentence with the wrong tense.
- Why are story arcs italicized in the article when the pages they link to (e.g. "Demon in a Bottle") use quotes?
- Good catch, fixed.
- I think the powers/allies/villains stuff is generally too long and should be trimmed. --Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 14:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- There's no powers section, but I believe that the allies and villains sections are an appropriate length. One review above expressed regret that it was as condensed as it was for length reasons.
- David Fuchs I've replied to each point above. I'm not going to ask you to get into a WP:FIXLOOP if you still think there are structural issues, but I've incorporated some of your suggestions and tried to justify some others. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:03, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think the publication history is much better. I disagree on the length of the fictional, in-universe elements; when the entirety of the cultural impact and legacy can apparently be summed up in two paragraphs, I think it's a little over the top that we need five times the amount of prose to cover supporting characters or villains. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did ask about the short length of the legacy section in my review, and TBUA mentioned he'd wrung all the detail he could out of the extant sourcing. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think the publication history is much better. I disagree on the length of the fictional, in-universe elements; when the entirety of the cultural impact and legacy can apparently be summed up in two paragraphs, I think it's a little over the top that we need five times the amount of prose to cover supporting characters or villains. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs talk 21:06, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments from Panagiotis Zois
[edit]Wonderful work on this article. Given than Anarky is the only comics character article that's FA, it will be great to see this get elevated to the same status. You've done a great job with it; to the point I'm tempted to actually start reading Iron Man titles. My comments will come soon. PanagiotisZois (talk) 00:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Old comments from Panagiotis Zois
|
---|
|
- PanagiotisZois, checking in. Did you intend to leave more comments? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:28, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- TBUA ? Gog the Mild (talk) 14:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Thebiguglyalien: Hello. Yes, now that you've done some work on Tony's creation, I'll look over that section and the later ones. PanagiotisZois (talk) 09:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
@Thebiguglyalien: Comments will come soon. I'll restart everything, so ignore what I've previously written. PanagiotisZois (talk) 13:05, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
- Creation
- First sentence should have a reference at the end, even if it's the same as the one from the next sentence.
- Same for "introduced as an active player in the Vietnam War."
- Unless I'm missing something, WP:WHENNOTCITE applies.
- Same for "introduced as an active player in the Vietnam War."
- Link "anti-war" to anti-war movement.
- Done.
- For the last sentence, slightly rework it along the lines of "Vietnam during the period in which Iron Man was created", to specify that Lee was talking about the specific time period.
- Reworded
- Link Howard Hughes.
- Linked
- I'd move the part that Lee "wanted to create a modernized Arthurian knight" after the next sentence. That way, you have two sentences talking about Flynn and Hughes acting as inspirations for Tony's character and physical appearance, and then bring up his armor.
- Good call, moved it down a sentence.
- Early years
- Maybe I'm overthinking things, but the second and third paaragraphs should be switched. That way, you have two paragraphs talking about his appearances in Tales of Suspense, and then get into The Avengers.
- The chronological order here is a little tricky, but I've switched them.
- Alright, first paragraph:
- Link comics anthology.
- Done.
- Write Ditko's full name and link it.
- Then in para 3 write just "Ditko".
- Also, as Ditko wasn't involved with the character's creation, even if it was his idea to turn the suit from gray to red-gold, his name shouldn't be in the infobox.
- I removed Ditko from the infobox, and I decided to move the mentions of him to the same place in the section.
- "Lee briefly delegated the writing [duties]".
- Also, when exactly did Lee delegate writing duties to others only to then reclaim them? The year should be listed.
- Added "duties", and I added "initially" because it was upon the release. It doesn't say exactly how long before he reclaimed them.
- Checking the Marvel Wikia, it seems that Stan Lee co-wrote Iron Man's first appearance with Larry Lieber, and from that point on, he co-wrote the next few stories with other writers, before fully going solo by the end of the year. Interesting to know, as the wording makes it seem he was uninvolved until he reclaimed writing duties. Well, irregardless, the sentence is fine if that's what the source says.
- I'm curious, Tony's first appearance was in Tales of Suspense #39 in December 1962, where his armor was gray. Did he make any further appearances with that gray armor, or did he get the gold-red one as early as his second appearance? Or was it changed from gray to gold and then from gold to gold-red? Sorry for being anal, and maybe I'm overanalyzing things, but they are slightly confusing.
- This should be clearer now that I've moved Ditko's info.
- Much clearer now.
- This should be clearer now that I've moved Ditko's info.
- Link comics anthology.
- When you say that "Heck continued as the primary Iron Man artist until 1965", I'm guessing you're talking about his appearances in Tales of Suspense and not The Avengers, right?
- Also, if Iron Man didn't receive his own comic until 1968, then the next sentence probably needs some reworking. You write that Ditko "became the artist for Iron Man", written in italics, which would suggest Tony already had his own comic.
- Correct, and I've removed the italics.
- "Iron Man's recurring nemesis, the Mandarin, first appeared shortly after in Tales of Suspense #50 (1964)". If the previous sentence mentions that Heck wasn't replaced by Kirby until 1965, then how could the Mandarin's appearance in 1964 be viewed as "shortly after"?
- This should also be clearer now that I've moved Ditko's info.
- Also, if Iron Man didn't receive his own comic until 1968, then the next sentence probably needs some reworking. You write that Ditko "became the artist for Iron Man", written in italics, which would suggest Tony already had his own comic.
- For paragraph 4, the last two sentences can be merged, especially if they have the same source.
- Also, "incorporating Marvel's fictional intelligence agency S.H.I.E.L.D." lacks a source.
- "Lee rewrote some of Iron Man's communist villains with personal motivations independent of their communist allegiances". I'm guessing this mean Lee rewrote some of the villain "to have personal motivations that were independent of their communist allegiances"?
- Merged the sentences, but it is sourced. You are correct about the motivations.
- "Lee rewrote some of Iron Man's communist villains with personal motivations independent of their communist allegiances". I'm guessing this mean Lee rewrote some of the villain "to have personal motivations that were independent of their communist allegiances"?
- Also, "incorporating Marvel's fictional intelligence agency S.H.I.E.L.D." lacks a source.
- Add comma between "environmentalism rather".
- I'm not sure if that's grammatically correct.
- 1970s
- "assigned Gerry Conway as the writer for Iron Man". Given that Tony had his own title by this point, it should be italicized.
- Added.
- "first of several authors". Usually, for comics it would be writer.
- "reform Iron Man beginning in 1971". Either add a comma after Iron Man, or alter it to "that began in".
- Switched to "writers". I'm not sure about this comma, but I added it.
- "reform Iron Man beginning in 1971". Either add a comma after Iron Man, or alter it to "that began in".
- Does the source state when Mike Friedrich's run occurred?
- It gives a few examples of issues in 1972 and 1973, but it doesn't give the exact years and seems to be talking more about the 1970s in general.
- Do the sources state when Mantlo took over; as in, which issue?
- It does not, and I think the year is sufficient anyway.
- "series beginning; add a comma.
- Added.
- When you mention Layton using certain magazines as references, then you state that "and they stayed informed". I'd reword it to "with him and Michelinie staying"
- The detail here is that they used the magazines to stay informed, not that they simply stayed informed in general. This change makes it a little wordy, but I added it.
- "they removed Iron Man's romantic interest". Who was that?
- Also, you don't need to repeat "removed" twice. Something like "they removed Iron Man's romantic interest (her name) and his robotic Life Model Decoy doubles, and they had Tony move to a different home".
- Added the name and reworded the sentence.
- Also, you don't need to repeat "removed" twice. Something like "they removed Iron Man's romantic interest (her name) and his robotic Life Model Decoy doubles, and they had Tony move to a different home".
- 1980s and 1990s
- "writers for Iron Man focused on Iron Man as a businessman". Repetition.
- Fixed.
- Given that Tony has quite a few relatives with the same last name that show up, and his company is Stark Industries, wouldn't it make more sense, when using his civilian identity, to his his given name instead of his surname? Especially since we're talking about a fictional character and not a real person.
- I initially did this for this reason, but it didn't read well to me, so I had swapped out "Tony" for "Stark".
- "beginning in issue" to "beginning with issue".
- Changed.
- "which Justin Hammer distributed to several villains". Did Hammer distribute Iron Man's technology during the story arc, or had he already done so and this is what started the arc?
- It was the beginning of the arc. Is there a wording change that would make this clearer?
- Hmm... I guess the simple way to solve it is this? Did Hammer distribute it only once at the beginning of the story to various villains, or did he keep doing so during the arc? In the former, past perfect; in the latter, past (perfect) progressive.
- It was the beginning of the arc. Is there a wording change that would make this clearer?
- "and again they" to "and they again"
- Both are correct, but changed.
- Minor thing, but I'd suggest "highly regarded" as "highly-regarded".
- "comic book writers at the time." lack a reference.
- Changed, and it is referenced.
- "comic book writers at the time." lack a reference.
- "which was already announced" => "which had already been" or "which had previously been".
- I agree that this reads better, but David gave me a hard time above for using "had" in this sense.
- "communism and the Vietnam War" lacks a reference.
- It does not.
- "American democracy for its own sake" lacks a reference.
- It does not.
- "anti-communist" should be linked. It's linked further down in his biography.
- Fixed.
- Regarding the the Tiannamen Square Massacre, add the year it occurred in.
- Added.
- Concerning "absence of Cold War politics", it be beneficial to add when it ended.
- 1990s is already specified at the start of the paragraph. Do you think it should be more specific? It's difficult because there's no one agreed date that the Cold War ended.
- Thinking about it again, you're right. Leave it as is.
- 1990s is already specified at the start of the paragraph. Do you think it should be more specific? It's difficult because there's no one agreed date that the Cold War ended.
- "often visited different". Is visited the proper word? Seems like "explored" would make a better fit.
- I was trying to avoid overuse of "explored", but I agree that it's better than "visited". Changed.
- Don't worry. You only use it scarcely to begin with.
- I was trying to avoid overuse of "explored", but I agree that it's better than "visited". Changed.
- "profit-sharing agreement." lacks a reference
- Same for "during the "Onslaught" event."
- They do not.
- Same for "during the "Onslaught" event."
- 2000s
- Shouldn't Ultimates link to The Ultimates (comic book)? Also, unless "The Avengers" refers to the comic book - in which case it should be italicized - then the definite article should be lowercase.
- Same with the New Avengers.
- It's referring to the team, not the comic. I've made the articles lowercase.
- Same with the New Avengers.
- As Avengers Disassembled was an event, it should have quotation marks, not be italicized.
- Same with "Civil War".
- I'm going off of their article titles, which are italicized.
- Same with "Civil War".
- I'd recommend putting "following the September 11 attacks" at the beginning of the sentence, have a comma, and then the rest.
- Added.
- "Adi Granov as the artist" needs a reference
- It has one.
- Concerning "In an allegory for the Patriot Act and government surveillance ... opposition to government surveillance", does "conservative" and "liberal" refer to the political ideologies of America? As in, conservatives / Republicans supported the Patriot Act, whereas liberals / Democrats oppossed it? Or is the reference to conservative support and liberal opposition to government in an abstract sense?
- Those are the terms used by the source.
- I see. Although I would like an explanation, I obviously can't demand that of you. The present state of the sentence is fine.
- Those are the terms used by the source.
- "this era of Iron Man's character" would probably reflect its intent better if written as "and in this era, Iron Man's character leaned".
- Reworded.
- 2010s and 2020s
- "This volume was written by Kieron Gillen" doesn't need to be a separate sentence from the previous one.
- Combined.
- "Axis" should have quotation marks.
- Added.
- "featuring Iron Man with a new reversed personality" probably requires and explanation. I know a few details about the event including a spell that inverted heroes' personalities and made them amoral, but new readers going through this won't know all that.
- This is described in more detail in the character biography. I think this provides the necessary context to describe the publication history.
- Given adjective order, Ironheart should be described as a "teenaged African-American girl"; but it's somewhat minor, so if you prefer it like this, leave it as such.
- I agree, changed.
- "following the "Iron Man 2020" event" lacks a reference.
- It does not.
- "deviations [made to Tony]'s character".
- Also, when it says previous series, is it referring only to its immediate predecessor, Infamous Iron Man, all of the previous Iron Man titles from the 2010s?
- Added "made to Tony's". The source isn't totally clear and seems to mean a bit of both, so I changed it to "the previous years".
- Also, when it says previous series, is it referring only to its immediate predecessor, Infamous Iron Man, all of the previous Iron Man titles from the 2010s?
Sorry @Thebiguglyalien:. Forgot to ping you. These are for the "Publication history" section. Once they're addressed, I'll move on to the next ones, but from a brief look into them, they seem fine. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 12:37, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Thebiguglyalien: A reminder that you need to address the comments by PanagiotisZois and David Fuchs. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:17, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- I already responded to David Fuchs, and I'm actually half way through an edit to address PanagiotisZois's comments right this moment. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:20, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- PanagiotisZois I've replied to your comments. I know you collapsed it, but I also replied to the comments for the lead since there were some good suggestions there. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
- The section definitely has a better flow now and is much more understandable; to my dense brain, at least. I'll go over the following sections as soon as I can. PanagiotisZois (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2024 (UTC)
Will add comments for following sections, but I noticed a couple of things in the infobox. --PanagiotisZois (talk) 14:48, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is not mention anywhere in the body that Tony's full name is "Anthony Edward Stark".
- No mention that he was born in Long Island.
- Regarding "Team affiliations", is the order alphabetical? If yes, New Avengers should be placed after Mighty Avengers.
Coord note
[edit]Given this nom's age, David's outstanding oppose and still further comments from PanagiotisZois, I think it's time to archive and complete improvements outside the FAC process. PanagiotisZois, I don't mean to curtail your review, if you have more comments you and TBUA can always continue discussion on the article talk page. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 09:51, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 10:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.