Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Indonesia/archive1

Indonesia

I find this article extremely informative and proffesionally done. I think that it has been very well-written, and is therefore some of Wikipedia's best work.

Object Unreferenced Sandy 18:54, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Needs references. -- Underneath-it-All 20:51, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object unreferenced. AdamBiswanger1 04:26, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object only one ref, very little on culture, Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 19:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object; yes, very proffesional, with a single reference. —Nightst a llion (?) 13:05, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some odd prose here and there.
- "Though Japan captured Java by March 1942, it initially could not find any national leader willing to collaborate with the Japanese government against the Dutch." What other government would they want a national leader to collaborate with, besides themselves?
- "Most Indonesians speak at least one of the several hundreds of local languages (bahasa daerah) as their first tongue." How can you speak more than one language as your first language?
- "The parliament chose Mrs. Megawati Sukarnoputri as the new Indonesian president from 2001 to 2004. Mrs. Megawati Sukarnoputri is the daughter of the first Indonesian President, Ir. Sukarno, and the leader of PDI-P, the winner of 1999 election." Do you really need to spell out "Mrs. Megawati Sukarnoputri" twice? Why not just "Sukarnoputri" or just "She"? I don't understand whether "the leader of PDI-P, the winner of 1999 election" refers to Sukarno or Sukarno's spouse. "Winner of the 1999 election" would read better.
- "Indonesia's first direct presidential election was held in 2004, and won by Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono." How about "Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono won Indonesia's first direct presidential election in 2004"? "It was the largest one-day election in the world." This claim begs for clarification (what other kind of election is there?) and citation.

In general, the prose seems heavy and turgid; reading goes slowly. The article would benefit from some pruning, saying the same in fewer words. Peirigill 09:27, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]