Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Hurricane Lane (2006)

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 00:02, 29 January 2008.

Hurricane Lane (2006)

Check external links

I'm nominating this article for featured article because I believe it passes all of the FA criterion. Of course, it very well might have some small MOS mistakes, or some grammar things, but I think they'd be minor enough that they could be easily addressed here. So, fire your comments away; I'll be ready to answer them. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 02:53, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, this is minor, but the veropedia parser gives me six bad links. 2x410s and 4x404--Doc^g 03:05, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I fixed most of them. Two of them I couldn't find; they were minor, so I deleted their information. One of them says it's bad in the above tools, but it works in the article. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:35, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not sure, but should there be a comma in here after the ref #3?--It moved slowly westward[3] and steadily organized.[4] Juliancolton (talk) 14:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessarily. A comma would imply a separate clause. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:40, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The article's FAC was my suggestion to hink, because I felt he had done a good job to the article. ^Mitch32^contribs 20:16, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: there aren't fundamental sections. --Brískelly^{[citazione necessaria]} 15:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Such as? This article is in the same format as dozens of other tropical cyclone articles. I suppose its closest analogy would be Hurricane Kenna. --♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Article is very well written, with a extremely detailed account of the storm. Hello32020 (talk) 11:55, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Well-written, appears to be comprehensive, and follows MOS. Karanacs (talk) 16:39, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.