Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Goldfish/archive2

Goldfish

I have expanded this article a lot, allowed a thorough peer review, and added many pictures. QuizQuick 00:21, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose: One of the major issues from the old Peer Review and the old FA nomination have not been addressed... and that is the lack of any inline citations. (If you need any help on this, feel free to ask.) --P-Chan 00:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Starting Aquarium section needs to be wikified. --Banana04131 02:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. The length and focus of sections is inconsistent, and inline citations need to be added as per P-Chan. RyanG e rbil10 (Drop on in!) 03:54, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. No references, no metric equivalents of measures in the body of the text, and the "Tips on Care" section should be renamed "Care" and made more encyclopedic and less like a how-to. Daniel Case 14:02, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you think the article overall is too short? QuizQuick 19:49, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object. Many sections, such as "Care", "Feeding" and the last half of "Edibility and cruelty" sound like a how-to manual, not an encyclopedia. Morgan695 19:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per all. —Eternal Equinox | talk 20:14, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]