Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cyclone Raja/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 13 May 2019 [1].


Nominator(s): Jason Rees (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Severe Tropical Cyclone Raja which impacted the South Pacific over the New Year of 1986/87. I have researched it in depth over the last few years and feel that the article is now complete and would benefit from an FAC. Jason Rees (talk) 16:43, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support, most are really easy.

Otherwise, the article is in good shape. It's generally well-written, and explains an old storm well. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 23:24, 9 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments Support by Hurricane Noah

[edit]

I will do a full review later, but I had some items I wanted to address first.

Images are appropriately licensed. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources review

[edit]
  • No spotchecks carried out
  • Source links are all working, per the external links checker tool
  • Various format issues:
  • There's a problem with the page ranges in ref 2
  • There are format inconsistencies in the archive and retrieval dates. Sometimes MDY is used, sometimes DMY. Decide on one or the other.
  • Language needs to be indicated for refs 6, 13, 25, and 27
  • Page refs should be given for news sources where there is no online link. This applies to refs 30, 31, 35, 36, 41, 43, 47 and 48
  • Subscription templates are pointless when there is no online link.
  • Support on prose, content, and presentation. A comprehensive and well-researched article with clear, no-nonsense prose. I've made a few minor edits, which the author can feel free to revert at his discretion if I've inadvertently changed the meaning of anything. My only outstanding critique would be that there's no link to the parent tropical cyclone page... it would be good to work that in somewhere. Otherwise, excellent. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:28, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Support by TropicalAnalystwx13

  • I don't think dashes are needed for "tropical-cyclone alerts" throughout the article?
  • Can you link "storm warning" somewhere?
  • "Although the system moved southwest and affected Tuvalu as expected, it failed to deepen as quickly as anticipated, however, its strong, gusty winds and high seas caused extensive damage to crops, coastal installations and buildings and flooded low-lying areas on the island nation." - This is a large sentence, can we use a semicolon or a period around "however"?
  • A pierod works better imo.Jason Rees (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Gale warnings were issued on 25 December for the two islands and remained in place until 28 December" - Wikilink gale.
  • "A tropical-cyclone alert was issued for the islands of southern Tonga on 29 December, when the possibility arose that Raja would turn southeast and affect central and southern Tonga.[3] The threat to Tonga increased, with a gale warning issued for Tongatapu and the Nomuka group of islands before all warnings for Tonga were cancelled on 30 December.[3]" - We established the threat increased when TC alerts were put in place, I don't think we need to explicitly say it.
  • "It also generated high seas, flooding, landslides and a storm surge which damaged Futuna's grass airstrip." - Wikilink storm surge.
  • "The aircraft, which also carried French Secretary of State for the South Pacific Gaston Flosse, evacuated the most seriously injured casualties to Wallis." - Just for me, "seriously injured casualties" is a bit repetitive. Can we substitute causalities for persons or individuals or something like that?

That's it from me. ☁❄ϟ TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk · contributions) 22:55, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.