Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Aloysius Schmitt/archive1

Aloysius Schmitt[edit]

There is good information in this article not found elsewhere, and it matches all the qualities as far as I could see. Laleena 23:18, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose it's a little more than a stub. Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 00:00, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Object If there is such a thing. Not sourced at all and stubby. Gzkn 00:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Nat91 01:37, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Read WP:WIAFA. There's a good reason this article has already been assessed as a Start. -- Kicking222 02:33, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Opppose, unreferenced, a stub, perhaps list it at peer review for ideas on how to expand and polish, and then apply for good article, which is for shorter articles. Sandy (Talk) 15:54, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Opppose, too short Armanalp 16:21, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unreferenced, too short to be a featured article. Hello32020 23:18, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's comment I myself could work on an anouncement on my page (a link on the page would be the place, probably Laleena's Files) announcing to all Aloysius Schmitt fans what to work on, and maybe give a couple of guidelines.Laleena 23:48, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per all above LuciferMorgan 00:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]