Wikipedia:Featured and good topic candidates/2009 Giro d'Italia/archive1

2009 Giro d'Italia

3 articles

Stage 1 to Stage 11

Stage 12 to Stage 21

List of teams and cyclists

I believe this satisfies the Good topic criteria, with three related articles all at GA quality and a related list at FL quality. I will be seeking to improve 2009 Giro d'Italia to FA, which would in turn satisfy the Featured topic criteria, but baby steps :P Alex finds herself awake at night _{(Talk · What keeps her up)} 02:03, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - looks good to me, good luck with the FA! rst20xx (talk) 23:24, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, it is nice to see high-quality articles on cycling. -MBK₀₀₄ 01:01, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent work. -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 02:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - sweet! (although "Result may be removed due to positive doping tests" probably needs an update) Nergaal (talk) 22:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's still of eventual if not impending likelihood, given that Di Luca is apparently fighting it. It took over two years before Floyd Landis was officially removed as winner of the 2006 Tour de France. Suppose the (admittedly) constant refs next to Di Luca's name should be eliminated, and let the mention of his doping in prose do the trick? Alex finds herself awake at night _{(Talk · What keeps her up)} 23:06, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Once this becomes a GT, you can also highlight that this will eventually need updating on the topic talk page, and if possible, the date the list of winners will next need updating. As long as it is noted there and on the articles talk page, it's not a problem for the nom. The rest looks good, so support.Yob Mod 13:21, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support —Terrence and Phillip 23:40, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Close with consensus to promote - rst20xx (talk) 22:42, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]