Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Water Droplet
- This picture was taken by Roger McLassus, and appears in the article Drop (liquid). I think it is a picture of good quality, exeeding the others I have seen of drops and ripples (including Fir's).
- Nominate and Support | AndonicO Talk 00:30, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. It's a nice photo but it doesn't meet the resolution requirement. Also, it appears you uploaded it over the top of a different, previous picture, but it maintains the Summary description of the previous picture. -- Moondigger 01:00, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Note that the original Commons version does in fact meet the resolution requirement. howcheng {chat} 02:06, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Since it came from Commons, just include it like any other image using the same syntax (I have done this for you). You don't need to move it to the English Wikipedia. howcheng {chat} 02:02, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Weak support. The reflections are a bit distracting, and it could benefit from some noise reduction, but overall it's an attractive image. --Tewy 02:16, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- weak oppose. The top portion of the image ruins it for me. say1988 05:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral - much as the drop and its splash are very attractive, the top section and the colour are icky and counterbalance this for me. -- CountdownCrispy ( ? 07:26, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, nothing special, see commons:Category:Water droplets -- Chris 73 | Talk 07:47, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I know, but this was my favorite. | AndonicO Talk 10:05, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, agree, nothing special, neither an exceptional technical nor encyclopedic quality. I dislike lighting and the wall. And a shot like this is easily stagable and repeatable. --Dschwen 19:43, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Sadly the least interesting moment of the evolution of the droplet has been caught - Adrian Pingstone 20:18, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted NauticaShades 13:08, 2 November 2006 (UTC)