Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria/doc
 | This is a documentation subpage for Wikipedia:Content assessment/A-Class criteria. It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original wikipedia page. |
 | This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
An A-Class article should approach the standards for a Featured article (FA), but will typically fall short because of minor style issues. The article may need minor copyedits, but it should be comprehensive, accurate, well-sourced, and well-written. A peer review by project editors should find the article to be a viable candidate for FA status. Assessing an article as A-Class requires more than one reviewer. There are two methods available for doing this.
Basic method
[edit]For WikiProjects without a formal A-Class review process, the proposal to promote to A-Class should be made on the article's talk page. To be granted, the proposal should be supported by two uninvolved editors, with no significant opposes. The review should also be noted on the project's discussion page.
Formal WikiProject review
[edit]A more formal review may be useful for some WikiProjects, such as the method used successfully at the Military History project. The method is summarized below:
- Add
A-Class=currentto the WikiProject banner at the top of the article's talk page, click on the "currently undergoing" link that appears then write up your nomination. - Add your nomination (via transclusion) to the review section of the WikiProject.
- Others from the WikiProject review the article.
- A coordinator from the project closes the review, and (if successful) the article is tagged and listed as A-Class.