Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Sports results
There is a continued controversy among editors as to whether reports of non-championship sporting event results should be the subject of Wikipedia articles. (Reports of championship and equivalent events are, by consensus, notable, and are not controversial.)
A number of articles including reports of individual 2005 English cricket season matches have been nominated in Articles for Deletion over the last few months.
There is no consensus among participants as to the suitability of the articles, with a number of arguments on each side. This centralized discussion is meant to save time and energy and prevent the same argument to be conducted in each article's individual AfD discussion.
Please discuss this issue on this discussion's Talk page. Arguments and proposals from the talk page will be summarized on this page.
- A request for adminship is open for discussion.
- Should it be a requirement for all administrators seeking resysop to have completed their last administrative action within the previous five years?
- Community response to the WMF over possible disclosure of editors' personal information in the Indian libel case
- Extended-confirmed pending changes and preemptive protection in contentious topics
- Are portals encyclopedic, and are they appropriate redirect targets?
- Should recall petitions be limited to signatures only?
- Nominations for the Arbitration Committee elections
- Should the length of a recall petition be shortened?
- Striking others' comments from archives