Wikipedia:Categories for deletion/Log/2005 August 13
August 13
[edit]Private schools
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Rename. ∞Who?¿? 03:27, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Category:California private schools → Category:Private schools in California
- Category:Ontario private schools → Category:Private schools in Ontario
- Category:Quebec private schools → Category:Private schools in Quebec
- Category:British Columbia private schools → Category:Private schools in British Columbia
per "...schools in xxxx" precedent used elsewhere. -The Tom 21:53, 13 August 2005 (UTC) changed to cfru ∞Who?¿? 07:06, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename all per nom. Wikipedia:Category titles is likely to reach the same conclusion. -Splash 17:49, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename all per Splash. --Kbdank71 16:35, 15 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename all per Splash. ∞Who?¿? 09:25, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
Paralympians
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Merge to Category:Paralympic competitors. ∞Who?¿? 03:29, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Paralympians and Category:Paralympic competitors
These two categories should be merged together... but which into which? 132.205.45.148 17:21, 13 August 2005 (UTC) changed to cfmu ∞Who?¿? 07:01, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Category:Paralympic competitors. I think the difference is moot, but we already have Category:Olympic competitors so we might as well . -Splash 17:49, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge per Splash. ∞Who?¿? 09:26, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was defer to cat titles discussion --Kbdank71 14:06, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Moved from WP:RM. Dragons flight 15:14, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
Category:Argentinian film directors → Category:Argentine film directors – Correct mispelling of Argentinian to Argentine. 64.12.116.139 03:42, 13 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Defer a little to Wikipedia:Category titles. -Splash 17:49, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Defer per Splash. (I hope someone is keeping track of these deferrals, been a few lately, think I need to get out my notepad) ∞Who?¿? 09:35, 18 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Deleted prior. ∞Who?¿? 03:30, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Unpopulated, and there isn't even a Kansas City Packers article. Unnecessary category. Delete Anthony 15:19, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete --Kbdank71 14:10, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Has a sub-cat for Indianapolis Hoosiers players, but that should be placed under Category:Major league baseball players by team. Unnecessary, IMHO. Delete. Anthony 15:19, August 13, 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep, {{Cfr}} removed prior. ∞Who?¿? 03:33, 20 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ddespie@san.rr.com has proposed renaming Category:City building games to Category:City building computer and video games.
I respectfully dispute this change for the following reasons:
- Category:City building games is a subcategory of Category:Computer and video game genres. The proposed addition is unnecessarily repetitive.
- The name Category:City building games is consistent with subcategory names under Category:Computer and video game genres, such as Category:Adventure games and Category:First person games. The proposed addition is inconsistent. -- Sitearm | Talk 16:34, 2005 August 14 (UTC)
- oppose rename until this category has enough of both computer and non-computer city building games as to be worth splitting. Until then, the extra baggage on the name is silly. --ssd 01:19, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I have removed {{cfr}} from this category. Reasons: 1. No response from Ddespie@san.rr.com to requests for reasons for change on his talk page; 2. Possibility cited that this user is so-called MascotGuy. Glad to discuss! -- Sitearm | Talk 19:18, 2005 August 16 (UTC)
- I have no problem with that. --Kbdank71 19:28, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this page.