Jump to content

Wikipedia:Canada collaboration/2006

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This nomination was selected as the January 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

1998 Ice Storm[edit]

A major disaster in Canada. A lot more information could be added. Could be worked to a similar quality of Oka Crisis, a recent Canadian Collaboration.
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. Zhatt 21:43, August 16, 2005 (UTC)
  2. File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 21:58, 16 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Tarret 20:02, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Exdonner 20:23, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. NormanEinstein 22:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. --CylePat 02:51, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

This nomination was selected as the February 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

Coquitlam, British Columbia[edit]

This article is in a sad state, and includes very little information besides a picture and an infobox.
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. AlbertR 00:31, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. DoubleBlue (Talk) 00:48, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Zhatt 06:22, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
  4. maclean25 05:13, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Tarret 20:02, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. p_b1999 (TalkContribution)18:22, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Alex anaya 16:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Comments:

  • Okay, I agree in a general sense that it is a worthy topic, but could we hear more as to what specifically could be updated with this topic? Saying it is in a sad state (which it is) does not provide a lot of guidance as to how it should be improved. If someone could suggest sub-categories of this topic (e.g. transit info? history? Did any famous painters/writers/politicians/whatever spend significant amounts of time here? In short what makes this city unique and interesting from a Wikipedian stand-point.) is applicable, and even an Ontarionian like me might vote for the topic. ;-) Captmondo 14:54, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination was selected as the March 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

Canadian Security Intelligence Service[edit]

This article is of upmost importance, and for an article that should have much information, it is currently lacking majorly. CSIS has had many recent issues, such as the new Air India bombing inquiry, and are currently at the height of their activities. This article definitely needs to have tons more information.
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. TDS (talk • contribs) 02:25, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dowew 23:22, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Sherurcij 05:37, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. File:Ottawa flag.png Spinboy 07:10, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --CylePat 20:54, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. --Caponer 05:06, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Jhohenzollern 03:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. ikh (talk) 19:21, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. -- Evanx(tag?) 08:33, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

This nomination was selected as the April 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

Leader of the Opposition (Canada)[edit]

Two paragraphs is pretty weak for the position of "Prime Minister-in-waiting".
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. Jord 00:38, 31 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Andrew pmk | Talk 01:49, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Tarret 20:02, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  5. --Omnieiunium 07:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Jhohenzollern 03:23, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Kilter 07:15, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Crna tec Gora 04:55, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Keeperoftheseal 03:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

  • No question the LO is important, but what should be added to the article that isn't there already? - Greyfedora 16:08, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • The concept of PM-in-waiting, the role of the opposition and the leader in the chamber, the creation of a shadow cabinet, the evolution of the position since 1867, etc. - Jord 18:11, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      • There may not be alot to adress, that hasnt been adressed, but the article is seems very haphazard
  • Many of the votes for this topic are stale. After what happened in March with CSIS (i.e. no significant edits), I'd hate to see April's collaboration take the same path. I've suggested on the talk page that old votes be pruned from the voting rolls, perhaps any vote older than 4 months. People who had their votes pruned can simply revote again. This ensures legitimate and current interest in the topic. I fear this topic will see no significant interest in April if it becomes the CCOTM over something more currently popular such as the Athabasca Tar Sands. --Dogbreathcanada 23:13, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I compared the articles and Leader of the Opposition (Canada) looks like a stub compared to Athabasca Tar Sands, I'd like to nominate the other, but it has to go sometimes and rules need to be followed. Even if it is ignored in April we have an exciting article collabaration coming in May (that looks to be on the way to a FA, perhaps?). feydey 20:41, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This nomination was selected as the May 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

Athabasca Oil Sands[edit]

Much more could be written about these oil sands given their economic, geopolitical, and environmental importance. Additionally the readability of the current article needs to be improved.
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. Kurieeto 00:16, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Dogbreathcanada 00:25, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  3. NormanEinstein 18:03, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Needs sources and polishing &c. feydey 20:14, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Miss Ethereal 19:01, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Kilter 07:14, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Daniel11 06:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. maclean25 19:59, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Deet 03:05, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Anchoress 03:32, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

This nomination was selected as the June 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

George-Étienne Cartier[edit]

Very important of course, I always wanted to expand this much more myself but I never got around to it...I probably won't be able to help anymore but it should still be expanded.
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. Adam Bishop 17:37, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Benw 05:41, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. feydey 00:39, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Kilter 07:12, 19 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Fluit 23:19, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Usgnus 00:53, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Anchoress 03:31, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Victoriagirl 16:17, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Captmondo 21:35, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

This nomination was selected as the July 2006 Canada collaboration. (improvements)

Scott Tournament of Hearts[edit]

This is a major Canadian sporting event, with growing scope each year. The current article contains little more than a list of winners. This article should include the history of the event, past venues, tournament details, notable years, etc...
(vote or comment)

Support:

  1. P0per 21:50, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  2. -- Earl Andrew - talk 00:19, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  3. --Picard102 09:17, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Jhohenzollern 03:24, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Anchoress 03:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Stormbay 16:19, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comments:

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Canada_collaboration/2006&oldid=66937041"