Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/SoxBot IV

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

SoxBot IV

Operator: Soxred93 | talk bot

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Automatic

Programming Language(s): Python, using pywikipedia

Function Summary: Automatic clearing of the sandbox.

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run): Continuous

Edit rate requested: 12 edits every 12 hours (see comment below), at 5 epm.

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): N

Function Details: OverlordQBot usually cleans the sandbox, but I have been seeing that it can stop for days at a time. It does not happen rarely, it actually happens a few times a month. I think that a more reliable bot could be used for sandbox clearing. I will use pywikipedia's clean_sandbox.py to clear the sandbox. I may soon make it run on the Introduction too. (by the way, I have been told by a few people that it is a good idea.) It will clean the sandbox every six hours, or immediately if it does not have the header.

Discussion

I don't see any issue with approving this task. Redundancy == good. :) SQL ^{Query me!} 07:02, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
One hour is a bit much imo, and also contradictory to both the HTML comment and the template which both say 12 hours. Q ^{T C} 07:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not a fan of the idea of it clearing as soon as the header is removed. I can imagine a vandal-bot getting into an edit fight and rendering the page useless (from ECs) to human editors. Once an hour should be enough. MBisanz ^talk 08:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I won't follow that script fully, I will have to make some modifications (e.g. allowing non-admin shutoff, like I do with all my other scripts). I was going to implement the immediate cleaning, but I don't have to now. I was also following what OverlordQBot was doing (6 hours), but I accidentally typed one. Soxred93 | talk bot 08:31, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I changed it a bit from what I put in the barfa. I think I increased the delay back to 12h for Intro instead of the pointlessly fast 30 minutes. Sand is still at 6h though Q ^{T C} 08:59, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good to go from me, a non-BAGer MBisanz ^talk 09:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Are you also planning to clean {{x1}} to {{x9}}, and {{Template sandbox}}? If so, please can you put noincludes around the header? (This was requested in various places (Template talk:Template sandbox is one I can remember at the moment), but can only be implemented by changing the sandbox-cleaning bots.) --ais523 14:39, 28 February 2008 (U T C)

Oops, that reminded me I forgot to finish adding those heh. Q ^{T C} 17:57, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think I can implement those pages as well. So what I am requesting: Clearing of the Sandbox, Introduction, X1-9, and Template sandbox every 12 hours. That fine? Soxred93 | talk bot 00:12, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. Whenever you are ready,

Approved for trial (50 edits or 3 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. -- Cobi^(t|c|b) 01:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hold off on the approving, I am going to use a different script. I request another trial. Soxred93 | talk bot 02:31, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (50 edits or 3 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. - Go ahead! —Reedy Boy 23:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How's this coming along? SQL ^{Query me!} 22:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it went fine to me. Approved. SQL ^{Query me!} 02:40, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.