Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Soulbot
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
This bot is a pywikipedia bot. It will be used semi-automatically for Interlanguage corrections. - Soulkeeper 12:21, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- One week trial approved, limit this to under 150 articles. Post difs/comments/etc here when trial is done. — xaosflux Talk 17:03, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Diffs: Special:Contributions/Soulbot — I did make one or two mistakes in the beginning, but I've cleaned up my own mess, and now that I'm starting to learn the ropes of editing almost 40 wikipedias at the same time, the error ratio has dropped quite a bit. But I must also admit that the English Wikipedia is very updated interlanguage-wise, and it is probably the Wikipedia which has the least use for Soulbot. Most of its edits do not affect en. Soulkeeper 10:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- As you can see, most of the edits are: (adding no), but there are others too... ;) [1] [2] [3]- Soulkeeper 18:42, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Diffs: Special:Contributions/Soulbot — I did make one or two mistakes in the beginning, but I've cleaned up my own mess, and now that I'm starting to learn the ropes of editing almost 40 wikipedias at the same time, the error ratio has dropped quite a bit. But I must also admit that the English Wikipedia is very updated interlanguage-wise, and it is probably the Wikipedia which has the least use for Soulbot. Most of its edits do not affect en. Soulkeeper 10:00, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- What is the required edits/min rate needed for this task? — xaosflux Talk 01:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- One edit per minute would be plenty. - Soulkeeper 15:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- OK, APPROVED, no flag requried. — xaosflux Talk 02:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.