Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Project Messenger Bot 2

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Withdrawn by operator.

Project Messenger Bot 2

Operator: Noommos (talk · contribs)

Time filed: 11:48, Saturday July 9, 2011 (UTC)

Automatic or Manual: Auto

Programming language(s): PHP

Source code available: On request

Function overview: Automate some steps of the WP:USCOTM process.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Archived request

Edit period(s): Planning to set it to run through the article nominations once per day.

Estimated number of pages affected: <20

Exclusion compliant (Y/N): Y

Already has a bot flag (Y/N): Y

Function details: Will tag articles that have been nominated with {{USnom}} and notify associated WikiProjects that the article has been nominated. When an article is selected as the collaboration of the month, the bot will update it's message on the WikiProjects talk page (or create a new section if the nomination message was archived etc). It's exclusion compliant if it is explicitly listed as a deny bot.

Discussion

Approved for trial (50 edits or 5 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. MBisanz ^talk 14:27, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I looked over the bot's edits so far - just wanted to chime in that it looks to be doing very well. Have you run into any problems so far? SQL ^{Query me!} 13:15, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, wish to withdraw this [1]. Here's the undocumented PHP source which uses my wAPI class. Feel free to use it for this task and others. Noom _talk ^stalk 18:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, there's issues regarding placing the message on the WikiProjects talk page and it won't detect messages it's placed there before. Noom _talk ^stalk 18:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Closing as Withdrawn by operator. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 19:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.