Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/Mdann52 bot 2
- The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Request Expired.
Operator: Mdann52 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)
Time filed: 14:08, Thursday January 23, 2014 (UTC)
Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Auto
Programming language(s): Python
Source code available: Yes, see original BRFA
Function overview: Clone of Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/HasteurBot; Origional op Has indicated they are not running it any more.
Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Extensive discussion on last bot task
Edit period(s):continuous
Estimated number of pages affected: ?
Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): yes
Already has a bot flag (Yes/No)no
Function details: See previous bot req.
Discussion
[edit]May not get this fully set up for a few days, but would appreciate permission to start this (and maybe the other 2 (BRFA's 2 and 3) if possible?) --Mdann52talk to me! 14:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Just a note that since I approved previous BRFAs (which is usually a good cause to review similar ones), instead I'll recuse myself from closing this one. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is the bot not running anymore? Is there an issue? And if so, how are you addressing it or making sure the same issue does nor occur again? — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 14:42, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hellknowz: see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kafziel/Proposed decision#Comment_on_additions_to_Proposed_Decision for background to this (simply, ArbCom proposed topic banning the editor, and he discontinued helping the project.) The bot had no issues; It was purely the ops decision that he felt he couldn't run the bot anymore. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
After the topic ban fell through, Hasteur indicated at Wikipedia:Bot_requests#Bot_Tasks_For_Adoption, that he intends to run the tasks further. 81.183.29.3 (talk) 20:53, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]- I am aware; It would be good to have a backup in case it goes down in the future.... --Mdann52talk to me! 15:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hellknowz: see Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kafziel/Proposed decision#Comment_on_additions_to_Proposed_Decision for background to this (simply, ArbCom proposed topic banning the editor, and he discontinued helping the project.) The bot had no issues; It was purely the ops decision that he felt he couldn't run the bot anymore. --Mdann52talk to me! 16:38, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
{{OperatorAssistanceNeeded|D}}
Do you still want to trial this or otherwise test it as a backup? MBisanz talk 18:35, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]- I lack much time for Wikipedia due to exams , so I will have to withdraw (or put on hold) for a few months....--Mdann52talk to me! 18:44, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.